Kenya’s University Funding Legal Dispute Explained

The Court of Appeal’s recent intervention in the ongoing university funding dispute in Kenya has further complicated an already volatile situation. On March 26, 2025, the appellate court suspended the High Court’s ruling that had previously declared the Variable Scholarship Loan Funding (VSLF) model unconstitutional. This decision temporarily reinstated the controversial funding framework, allowing the government to resume its implementation while the appeal is heard. The suspension was granted based on arguments from the Higher Education Loans Board (HELB) and the Universities Fund (UF), both of which warned that halting the VSLF model would cripple their ability to allocate funds, potentially leading to financial instability and even the closure of multiple institutions. Former HELB Acting CEO Mary Muchoki emphasized in an affidavit that the High Court’s ruling could result in the indefinite closure of universities, underscoring the gravity of the situation. Similarly, former Universities Fund CEO Geoffrey Monari defended the VSLF model as a more equitable and cost-effective funding mechanism, cautioning that the previous decision could trigger a crisis in university financing. By suspending the High Court’s ruling, the Court of Appeal sought to balance the urgent need to sustain university funding with the concerns raised regarding the legality and fairness of the model. However, this move introduces another layer of uncertainty, as universities, students, and policymakers must now navigate an unpredictable legal landscape while awaiting a final resolution.

A Report by KTN News Kenya

To mitigate the immediate fallout and provide transparency, the Court of Appeal issued several directives aimed at ensuring that students, universities, and other stakeholders remain informed about the potential implications of the ongoing legal battle. The court instructed the Attorney General, HELB, and the Kenya Universities and Colleges Central Placement Service (KUCCPS) to disseminate detailed information about the VSLF model to all relevant parties within 14 days. This included clear communication to current beneficiaries and prospective applicants that the funding framework could still be subject to further changes. Additionally, the appellate court mandated the establishment of an appeals mechanism within the same timeframe, allowing students dissatisfied with their funding allocations or categorization to seek redress. These directives were an attempt to address the concerns raised by the High Court regarding the lack of transparency and due process in the implementation of the VSLF model. Nonetheless, the broader financial challenges facing Kenyan universities persist, as public institutions continue to struggle with substantial funding deficits while private universities remain burdened by unpaid government sponsorship funds. Although the temporary reinstatement of the VSLF model might alleviate some immediate financial pressures, the long-term sustainability of higher education funding in Kenya remains a pressing issue that requires a more comprehensive and permanent solution. The shift towards increased household contributions under the VSLF model raises additional concerns about affordability, particularly for students from low-income backgrounds, who now face the prospect of significant debt accumulation through student loans.

The current funding controversy is part of a broader historical shift in Kenya’s higher education financing strategy, transitioning from the Differentiated Unit Cost (DUC) model, which had been in place since 1995, to a more individualized, means-tested approach. Under the DUC model, public universities received block funding based on student enrollment and the costs associated with different academic programs, with the government initially expected to cover 80% of the unit cost. However, persistent underfunding led to financial distress for universities, necessitating alternative approaches. In May 2023, the government introduced the VSLF model, which sought to provide direct funding to students through a combination of scholarships, loans, and household contributions, assessed via a Means Testing Instrument (MTI). While this shift was designed to target financial aid to the most economically vulnerable students and encourage universities to diversify their revenue sources, it has sparked concerns about access and equity. The ongoing legal uncertainties surrounding the VSLF model have further exacerbated these concerns, as students remain unsure about their financial obligations, and universities continue to grapple with inconsistent funding. Moving forward, Kenya must establish a stable, transparent, and equitable university financing system that balances institutional sustainability with student accessibility. This requires strengthening legal frameworks, improving the MTI to ensure fairness, enhancing government investment, and exploring diversified funding sources such as public-private partnerships and alumni contributions. Without such reforms, the country risks entrenching financial instability in its higher education sector, limiting opportunities for students, and undermining national development objectives.

References:

Jijuze Impact of Kenya’s Court Decision on University Funding

The Standard Court of Appeal suspends ruling on university funding model

Kenya News Agency Govt reaffirms commitment to new varsity funding model

All Africa Kenya: COA Temporarily Allows Impementation of New University Funding Model


Kenya’s Oil and Gas Ambitions: Opportunities and Challenges

Kenya is intensifying its efforts to become a significant oil and gas producer, with the government introducing various incentives to attract global investors. This ambition builds on a history of exploration that began in the 1950s and led to the notable discovery of commercially viable oil in the South Lokichar Basin in 2012. Despite this potential, sustained commercial production has remained elusive. The government’s latest strategy involves a licensing round for ten promising oil and gas blocks, scheduled for September 2025. Alongside this, the government is offering tax incentives and flexible terms for Production Sharing Contracts, signaling a strong commitment to developing the sector. Investments in crucial infrastructure, such as the expansion of Lamu Port and the advancement of the Lamu-Lokichar pipeline project, are also underway to support exploration and future production.

A Citizen Digital Report (2022)

However, Kenya’s journey in oil and gas exploration has encountered numerous obstacles. While early efforts identified hydrocarbon presence in basins like Lamu and Anza, they were largely unsuccessful in achieving commercial viability. Logistical challenges, particularly the absence of a reliable pipeline to transport oil from the Turkana region to the coast, have been a major hindrance. Environmental concerns and the critical need for responsible resource management, along with the imperative of fostering positive relationships with local communities, have also posed significant challenges. The substantial oil reserves in the South Lokichar Basin, estimated at 2.85 billion barrels, have yet to be fully exploited due to these infrastructure deficits, coupled with economic uncertainties linked to fluctuating global oil prices and the substantial upfront capital required for development. Regulatory complexities and the evolving global energy landscape, with its increasing emphasis on renewable energy sources, have further complicated the path to commercial production. The recent withdrawal of key partners from the Lokichar project has also added to the existing difficulties.

Experts suggest that while Kenya’s oil and gas sector holds considerable promise, particularly with the untapped potential in various sedimentary basins, realizing this potential depends on effectively addressing the current challenges. Key recommendations for the Kenyan government include accelerating the development of essential infrastructure, most notably the Lokichar-Lamu pipeline, and enhancing the regulatory framework to provide greater clarity and attract sustained investment. Offering competitive fiscal terms, actively pursuing strategic partnerships, and ensuring transparency and good governance within the sector are also deemed crucial. Moreover, prioritizing sustainable and responsible resource management practices, alongside meaningful engagement with local communities and the promotion of local content, are vital for the long-term success and social acceptance of oil and gas development in Kenya. By drawing lessons from international case studies of successful oil and gas development and focusing on these critical areas, Kenya aims to convert its hydrocarbon aspirations into tangible economic progress and development.

References:

The Star Kenya to avail 10 oil and gas blocks to investors

The Standard Kenya to restart licensing of 10 oil and gas blocks in September

AInvest Oil Daily | Kenya Launches Oil Block Bidding, API Reports U.S. Crude Inventory Drop, ONGC Diversifies

Africa Energy Setback for Kenya’s Oil Ambitions as Tullow Oil’s Field Development Plan Faces Rejection

Pumps Africa Oil and Gas Pricing Trends in Africa: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Outlook

Upstream TotalEnergies and Africa Oil quit Kenya oil project, leaving Tullow without partners

Kenya Faces Crisis After USAID Funding Withdrawal

The abrupt cessation of funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has sent shockwaves through Kenya, marking a significant turning point in the country’s development trajectory. The decision by the US government to terminate approximately 83% of USAID’s global contracts has had an immediate and profound impact, with Kenya ranking as the seventh most affected nation worldwide, underscoring its heavy reliance on donor funding for crucial sectors. The sheer scale of the withdrawal, encompassing the cancellation of numerous projects across health, education, economic development, and governance, has left a void that will be challenging to fill. Organizations on the ground, such as CFK Africa, have reported widespread panic and uncertainty as essential healthcare services, particularly in the fight against HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis, face severe disruptions . The sudden halt has not only jeopardized the continuation of vital programs but has also resulted in significant job losses, with estimates suggesting that at least 35,000 Kenyans working in USAID-funded initiatives are now facing unemployment . This abrupt departure of a major development partner has ignited discussions about the long-term sustainability of Kenya’s development and the urgent need for alternative strategies.  

A Citizen Digital Report

The health sector in Kenya is bearing the brunt of the USAID funding freeze, with potentially devastating consequences for the progress made over the past two decades, particularly in combating the HIV/AIDS epidemic. While the US has allocated $66 million to HIV/AIDS programs in Kenya for 2025, this represents a significant decrease from the $846 million provided in 2023, signaling a concerning downward trend. The World Health Organization (WHO) had earlier warned that Kenya was among several countries at risk of running out of essential HIV drugs due to the aid pause, potentially undoing years of hard-won gains and leading to a resurgence of the disease. The termination has severely impacted the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which relies heavily on USAID’s logistical support, leading to an immediate halt in HIV treatment, testing, and prevention services across more than 50 countries. Reports from organizations like Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) paint a grim picture of service shutdowns and treatment disruptions, leaving millions of vulnerable individuals without access to life-saving medications and care . The situation is further compounded by existing shortages of some HIV drugs within the country, creating a perfect storm that threatens to overwhelm the healthcare system .  

Beyond the immediate crisis in the health sector, the USAID funding cuts are expected to have far-reaching long-term repercussions across Kenya’s social and economic landscape . Programs supporting maternal and child health, tuberculosis and malaria control, water and sanitation, education, and economic development are all facing significant funding shortfalls . The termination of initiatives aimed at improving primary literacy, supporting smallholder farmers, and promoting trade and investment will hinder progress in these crucial areas . The Kenyan government now faces immense pressure to find alternative funding sources and implement sustainable development strategies to mitigate the impact of this significant withdrawal of aid . This necessitates a concerted effort to strengthen domestic resource mobilization, diversify international partnerships, engage the private sector, and foster local innovation to ensure the continued well-being and progress of the nation .

References:

The Star Kenya 7th most affected by US aid freeze

Aljazeera USAID’s demise raises fears for millions of lives across the Global South

Capital Business USAID funding halt to hit Kenya’s economy, social sectors – report

Nation USAID funding cuts disrupt vulnerable rural livelihoods in Turkana

Think Global Health Life After USAID: Africa’s Development, Education, and Health Care

Reliefweb CFK Africa Witnesses Devastating Effects in Kenya from End of U.S. Agency for International Development Support

Willow Health Media USAID Shut for Good: Millions at risk in Kenya, thousands jobless overnight 













High Court Strikes Down Government Media Directive

In a significant blow to the government’s media policy, the High Court has resoundingly declared as unconstitutional a directive that sought to channel all public sector advertising exclusively through the state-owned Kenya Broadcasting Corporation (KBC). This landmark ruling, delivered by Justice Lawrence Mugambi, effectively nullifies the order issued by the ICT Principal Secretary, Edward Kisiang’ani, in March 2024, which mandated that all government ministries, agencies, and parastatals place their advertising solely with the national broadcaster. The court’s decisive action underscores the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the tenets of the Kenyan Constitution, particularly those safeguarding media freedom, equality, and the principles of good governance, thereby setting a crucial precedent for the relationship between the state and the media landscape.  

A Report by KTN News Kenya

The High Court’s judgment hinged on the finding that the directive contravened several fundamental articles of the Constitution. Justice Mugambi meticulously detailed how the policy violated Article 10, which enshrines good governance and integrity, Article 27, which guarantees equality and freedom from discrimination, and Article 34, which protects the freedom of the media. The court reasoned that limiting government advertising to a single entity constituted an indirect form of control over the media, potentially stifling dissenting voices and undermining the independence of the press. Furthermore, the judge pointed out a critical procedural flaw, asserting that the ICT Principal Secretary had overstepped his legal authority, as the power to make such a significant policy decision regarding public procurement of advertising services rests solely with the Treasury Cabinet Secretary. This lack of legal mandate rendered the directive void from its inception, highlighting the importance of adherence to established legal frameworks in government operations.

The implications of this ruling extend far beyond a mere legal victory; it serves as a powerful reaffirmation of the critical role of a diverse and independent media in a democratic society. Had the directive been allowed to stand, it would have created an uneven playing field, unfairly disadvantaging private media houses that rely heavily on government advertising revenue for their sustainability. Critics had argued that such a policy would not only threaten the financial viability of independent media outlets, potentially leading to job losses and closures, but also limit the public’s access to a plurality of voices and perspectives. The court’s decision safeguards against the potential for government influence through financial leverage, ensuring that the media can continue to operate as a watchdog, holding power to account and providing the public with the information necessary for informed participation in national discourse.

References:

Citizen Digital High Court declares gov’t advertising monopoly unconstitutional

Nation ‘Non-existent powers’: Court quashes PS Kisiang’ani order restricting State advertising to KBC

Kenyans.co.ke High Court Rules That Kisiang’ani Directive Moving Govt Advertising to KBC is Unconstitutional

The Eastleigh Voice High Court declares ICT PS Kisiang’ani has no powers to decide who gets govt advertising

The Standard State cancels adverts to Standard Media as court set to rule on ad monopoly case



Kenya Ends $3.6 Billion IMF Loan: A Turning Point

Kenya’s decision to mutually end its $3.6 billion loan arrangement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) marks a significant shift in the nation’s approach to economic management, primarily driven by a confluence of unmet fiscal targets and mounting public discontent . The existing Extended Fund Facility (EFF) and Extended Credit Facility (ECF) arrangement, while having disbursed a substantial $3.12 billion, faced a critical juncture with its ninth review, which ultimately was not pursued . The core issue stemmed from Kenya’s inability to meet specific fiscal obligations stipulated under the program, leading to the cancellation of a significant $850 million payment . This failure to adhere to the agreed-upon spending and revenue collection benchmarks highlighted the challenges President Ruto’s administration encountered in balancing the demands of fiscal discipline with the socio-political realities on the ground . Compounding these difficulties were the widespread public protests against the Finance Bill of 2024, a piece of legislation designed to boost government revenue in line with IMF recommendations but which proposed tax hikes on essential goods, triggering significant public outcry and ultimately its withdrawal . Despite this setback, Kenya has already initiated discussions with the IMF for a new loan agreement, indicating a continued recognition of the necessity for external financial support as the nation grapples with a considerable debt burden.  

A Report by NTV Kenya

The abrupt termination of the IMF program carries significant implications for Kenya’s already strained economic landscape, particularly concerning its high levels of debt and the stability of its financial markets . With a debt-to-GDP ratio exceeding sustainable thresholds and a substantial portion of government revenue already committed to debt servicing, the discontinuation of IMF funding introduces a potential funding gap that could further exacerbate these vulnerabilities . While the government has sought alternative financing through a loan from the UAE and the restructuring of Eurobonds, these measures may come with increased borrowing costs and potential foreign exchange risks . Experts also anticipate that the absence of the IMF program’s oversight could lead to renewed pressure on the Kenyan Shilling and the external sector, potentially impacting inflation and investor confidence . The IMF itself had previously assessed Kenya’s public debt as being at a high risk of distress, and the termination of the program could intensify these concerns, making future access to international capital markets more challenging and potentially increasing the long-term risk of default .  

Looking ahead, Kenya faces a period of economic uncertainty that will require careful navigation and strategic policy decisions . The government will likely need to implement further austerity measures, including budget cuts and enhanced domestic revenue collection, to compensate for the lost IMF funding and maintain fiscal credibility . The success of these measures, coupled with the ongoing negotiations for a new IMF loan agreement targeted for finalization by November 2025, will be crucial in determining Kenya’s economic trajectory . Building public trust and ensuring transparency in the implementation of fiscal reforms will be paramount, especially in light of the recent widespread protests against IMF-backed austerity measures . Ultimately, Kenya’s ability to achieve long-term economic stability and inclusive growth will depend on its commitment to fiscal discipline, equitable revenue mobilization, and sound governance practices in the absence of the previous IMF program.

References:

News Central Kenya Abandons Existing IMF Programme in Pursuit of New Loan Agreement

Further Africa Kenya and IMF Drop Loan Review and Move Toward New Financing Deal

Daba Finance Kenya Faces IMF Setback After $800M Review Falls Through

Aljazeera What do the IMF and foreign debt have to do with Kenya’s current crisis?

The Eastleigh Voice Gen Z anti-tax demos dented Kenya’s GDP growth prospect for 2025 – IMF

African Business IMF exit and eurobonds raise questions over Kenyan debt

































Impact of Kenya’s Court Decision on University Funding

Kenya’s ambitious new university funding model, intended to revolutionize higher education financing, remains in a state of uncertainty following a decisive blow from the High Court, which declared it unconstitutional in December 2024. Justice Chacha Mwita cited a lack of legal framework, discriminatory elements based on financial ability, school type, age, and ambiguous criteria like “household income,” and insufficient public participation as key reasons for the ruling, a decision hailed as a victory by students and civil society groups who had long protested the model’s perceived unfairness. The National Student Caucus celebrated the ruling as an opportunity for national reflection on tertiary education funding, echoing the sentiments of thousands of students who had earlier taken to the streets in September 2024, decrying the increased financial burden placed on them and their families, with over 10,000 students even appealing their assigned funding allocations. Parents, too, voiced relief, having expressed fears that the new model would lock out deserving students due to unaffordable costs and flawed categorization through the Means Testing Instrument (MTI). The Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC), a key petitioner in the case alongside the Elimu Bora Working Group and a Students’ Caucus, framed the model as a manifestation of “neoliberal” policies that commodify education, emphasizing the need for a funding approach that prioritizes accessibility and equity for all Kenyans, as education is considered a fundamental public good.  

A Report by Citizen Digital

Despite the High Court’s firm stance, the government has swiftly appealed the decision, with Education Cabinet Secretary (CS) Julius Ogamba reaffirming the commitment to the model’s core principles of ensuring no needy student is left behind and highlighting that the government had doubled funding to universities in the past two years. While acknowledging the initial challenges and inaccuracies in the Means Testing Instrument (MTI), the government is actively working on revisions, with a special committee appointed by President William Ruto submitting a preliminary report proposing changes and aiming for a re-introduction by September to coincide with the admission of new first-year students. However, this legal tug-of-war has created a significant impasse, leaving universities in a precarious financial situation. Professor Daniel Mugendi, chair of the Public Universities Vice Chancellors’ Committee, warned of an impending crisis if the matter is not resolved promptly, highlighting the difficulties in running institutions with delayed fund disbursements, especially for first and second-year students who cannot access government support as the allocated funds are held by the Higher Education Loans Board (HELB) and the Universities Fund (UF) awaiting court direction. The Universities Fund (UF) Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Geoffrey Monari, also voiced concerns that the suspension could exacerbate the already mounting public debt for universities, emphasizing the intended benefits of the new model in alleviating financial strain and granting universities independence to commercialize research. Currently, universities are navigating the uncertainty by agreeing not to demand fees from first and second-year students until the issue is resolved through the courts, while relying on the older Differentiated Unit Cost (DUC) model for continuing students.  

As the legal battle continues, stakeholders are actively proposing alternative solutions and voicing their concerns about the long-term implications. Private universities, through the National Association of Private Universities in Kenya (NAPUK), have seized this moment to advocate for a fundamental shift towards a loan-based funding model, suggesting the establishment of a unified National Students Financial Aid Corporation (NSFAC) to streamline financial assistance across both public and private institutions and move away from a “social-welfare orientation.” This proposal reflects a broader debate about the sustainability and equity of higher education financing in Kenya, especially considering historical funding disparities where private universities received significantly less government support under the DUC model. The ongoing uncertainty has left many first and second-year students in limbo, unsure of the fees they will ultimately be required to pay, with some even facing difficulties in enrolling or sitting for exams due to the funding crisis, as universities demand outstanding fees based on the now-unconstitutional band system. Furthermore, an audit report revealed significant operational challenges and management flaws in the initial implementation of the new funding model, including a lack of coordination between key agencies like the UF, HELB, and the Kenya Universities and Colleges Central Placement Service (KUCCPS), raising concerns about the efficiency and fairness of fund allocation and the long-term sustainability of the fund given low loan repayment rates. The path forward remains unclear, but the need for a resolution that addresses both the financial sustainability of universities and the accessibility of higher education for all qualified Kenyan students is more pressing than ever.  

References:

People’s Dispatch Kenya’s High Court delivers blow to neoliberal university funding model

Business Daily Hundreds of students locked out of varsities as finance woes persist

KBC Private Universities offer middle ground proposals on funding model

Nation Ogamba: Improved draft for new varsity funding model ready

Capital News High Court declines to lift orders quashing new University Funding Model

Nation Hundreds fail to report to universities over funding crisis

Kenya’s Healthcare Financing: SHA Performance Review

Six months after its nationwide launch in October 2024, Kenya’s ambitious transition from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) to the Social Health Authority (SHA) and its financing arm, the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF), is facing significant challenges, casting a shadow over the nation’s pursuit of Universal Health Coverage (UHC). An early assessment reveals a concerning decline in the implementation’s performance score, dropping from 46 percent in December to a meager 44 percent by February 2025, earning a “poor grade of D” . This regression, highlighted by the Rural and Urban Private Hospitals Association of Kenya (Rupha), points to a deterioration in crucial service delivery areas, notably the financial health of healthcare providers, the functionality of the new system, and the efficiency of outpatient reimbursements . While some progress has been noted in areas like e-contracting and patient verification, these minor advancements are struggling to offset the growing difficulties in critical domains such as claims management and ensuring the financial stability of hospitals and clinics across the country .

A Report by Citizen Digital

A major stumbling block in the initial phase of SHA/SHIF has been the glaring financial instability plaguing healthcare providers due to inconsistent and delayed payments . Alarmingly, nearly half of all healthcare facilities reported receiving irregular payments as of February 2025, with the situation particularly dire for smaller, level two and three hospitals, where a staggering 64 percent reported receiving no payments at all . This precarious financial situation is compounded by a substantial inherited debt of Sh30.9 billion from the NHIF, further straining the already limited resources of the SHA . The significant funding gap between the projected Ksh168 billion needed for full implementation and the mere Ksh6.1 billion allocated to the SHA in the current budget raises serious questions about the long-term sustainability of the scheme . Operational inefficiencies are also hindering progress, with increasing difficulties reported in claims management and the effectiveness of new reimbursement models . Moreover, ongoing system updates and persistent challenges in navigating the SHA portal are impacting service delivery, while public hospitals are grappling with long waiting times and service delays .

Public perception and adoption of the new healthcare system also present considerable hurdles. Despite the mandatory nature of the scheme, registration and active contribution rates remain worryingly low, with only 3.3 million Kenyans actively contributing out of the 19.4 million registered . This is further underscored by the fact that initial voluntary registration fell far short of the government’s target . Public resistance has been fueled by concerns over the new contribution model, which sees salaried workers contributing a higher percentage of their income compared to the previous flat rate under NHIF . This has led to calls for a fairer system, particularly for low-income households . Furthermore, reports indicate a concerning rise in out-of-pocket expenses for patients, particularly in private and faith-based facilities, contradicting the very aim of UHC to reduce the financial burden of healthcare . Coupled with reports of limited coverage and lower reimbursement rates for specialized treatments compared to the NHIF, the initial performance of SHA/SHIF suggests that significant challenges must be urgently addressed to ensure its effectiveness in providing equitable and quality healthcare for all Kenyans .

References:

Nation Explainer: How to make Kenya’s NHIF-SHIF transition less painful

Nation Healthcare reforms suffer setback as SHA performance declines

Nation Bold commitment to Kenya’s healthcare equity and growth

Rironi-Mau Summit Road Upgrade: A Game Changer for Kenya’s Economy

The impending transformation of the Rironi – Mau Summit road is generating considerable excitement across Kenya and the East African region, promising a significant leap forward in connectivity and economic prosperity. This ambitious infrastructure project, upgrading the existing congested two-lane highway into a modern four-lane dual carriageway spanning approximately 175 kilometers, is not just about easing traffic; it’s a strategic move to solidify Kenya’s position as a pivotal trade and transport hub . As a crucial segment of the Northern Corridor, this road links the bustling port of Mombasa to landlocked neighbors like Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, South Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, making its upgrade a matter of regional economic significance . For the millions who rely on this route, the promise of drastically reduced travel times, potentially halving the journey between major centers like Nakuru and Nairobi, offers not just convenience but also increased productivity and access to opportunities . This development follows a somewhat turbulent path, with an initial agreement with a French consortium being cancelled before the project was recently awarded to a Chinese firm, signaling a shifting landscape in Kenya’s infrastructure partnerships . The groundbreaking, slated for June 2025 with a targeted completion by June 2027, marks a renewed commitment to tackling the persistent congestion that has long plagued this vital artery.

A Report by Citizen Digital

The ripple effects of this enhanced connectivity are expected to extend far beyond smoother commutes, significantly boosting Kenya’s tourism and manufacturing sectors. Western Kenya boasts an array of natural wonders, from the flamingo-filled Lake Nakuru National Park to the vast plains of the Maasai Mara, attractions that will become more accessible with reduced travel times . This improved access is anticipated to draw more domestic and international tourists, injecting vital revenue into local economies and creating employment opportunities in the hospitality and service industries . Simultaneously, the manufacturing sector stands to gain immensely from a more efficient transportation network . The seamless movement of raw materials and finished goods is crucial for industrial growth, and the upgraded Rironi – Mau Summit road promises to streamline supply chains, lower logistics costs, and enhance the competitiveness of Kenyan-made products . This project aligns with the government’s broader vision for infrastructure-led economic growth, recognizing that efficient transport links are fundamental to unlocking the full potential of various sectors and fostering both national and regional trade . The anticipated creation of approximately 1,500 jobs during the construction phase and another 200 during operation further underscores the project’s potential to empower local communities.

Beyond the immediate economic benefits, the Rironi – Mau Summit road upgrade is poised to deliver significant social advantages, improving the quality of life for countless Kenyans. Enhanced connectivity translates to better access to essential services such as healthcare and education, particularly for those living in the regions along the corridor . For instance, the Rongai Level 4 Hospital in Nakuru County is expected to provide more timely care to accident victims due to its proximity to the upgraded highway . Moreover, improved road infrastructure in rural areas has been shown to positively impact household well-being and facilitate access to markets for farmers and small businesses, potentially increasing incomes and reducing social isolation . While the project has undergone environmental and social impact assessments, ensuring mitigation measures are in place will be crucial to address potential negative impacts such as land acquisition and disruption to local livelihoods . Overall, the Rironi – Mau Summit road project represents a transformative undertaking with the potential to catalyze economic growth, enhance regional integration, and deliver tangible improvements to the lives of Kenyans by providing safer, faster, and more reliable transportation .  

References:

Nation Construction of Rironi-Mau summit four lane road begins in June

Nation Ruto: Dualling of Nairobi-Nakuru highway to start next year

Nation Murkomen: We will build Rironi-Mau Summit highway without toll fees, debt

The Eastleigh Voice Rironi-Mau Summit road upgrade to begin in June, completion set for 2027

Kenyans.co.ke KeNHA to Expand Nairobi-Nakuru-Mau Summit Highway to Four Lanes, Completion Set for 2027

KBC Rironi-Mau Summit Road expansion to begin in June after Cabinet nod

 















The Future of Kenya’s Car Manufacturing Landscape

The Kenyan automotive industry is currently at a fascinating crossroads, marked by both promising developments and significant headwinds. While experiencing a notable surge in vehicle exports across East Africa, signaling a growing regional demand, the sector is also grappling with the imminent enforcement of stricter age limit regulations for imported used vehicles, creating a compliance rush for dealers. Amidst these dynamics, the local manufacturing scene has witnessed a dramatic turn with the re-entry of Mobius Motors, Kenya’s first homegrown vehicle manufacturer, under new Middle Eastern ownership, sparking hopes for a revitalized domestic production. This positive development, however, is counterbalanced by the announced departure of CMC Motors Group, a long-established player in the East African automotive and agricultural machinery market, citing unsustainable economic pressures. These parallel events underscore the volatile and transformative nature of the industry as it navigates evolving regulations, global competition, and shifting market dynamics.

A Report by Dennis THE NATIONAL

Several key challenges persist within the Kenyan automotive sector, threatening to impede its progress. Vehicle importers are facing a race against time and financial risks associated with the new age limit for used car imports, compounded by foreign currency shortages and potential price inflation. Local automotive manufacturing, even with the anticipated revival of Mobius Motors, continues to struggle against the dominance of cheaper used imports, reliance on foreign components, infrastructure limitations, and a shortage of skilled labor. The ambitious transition towards electric vehicles is also fraught with obstacles, including a limited charging infrastructure, high upfront costs, battery concerns, policy uncertainties, and low public awareness. Furthermore, the intricate import procedures for used cars add another layer of complexity for businesses. The impending exit of CMC Motors introduces additional concerns, potentially leading to job losses and disruptions in the supply of vehicles and agricultural equipment, highlighting the broader economic vulnerabilities within the region.

Looking ahead, the Kenyan automotive industry faces several potential pitfalls that could undermine its long-term sustainability. Economic volatility, inconsistent government policies, and the slow growth of local manufacturing capacity pose significant risks. Lagging infrastructure development, particularly for roads and EV charging, could further hinder the industry’s advancement. Failure to adapt to global automotive trends and increasing regional competition also present considerable challenges. However, with strategic interventions focusing on clear policy frameworks, investment in local manufacturing and infrastructure, skills development, and regional collaboration, Kenya has the potential to overcome these hurdles. The re-emergence of Mobius Motors offers a beacon of hope for local production, while the gap left by CMC Motors could present opportunities for new players. Ultimately, the resilience and adaptability of the Kenyan automotive industry will determine its ability to navigate these complexities and realize its potential as a key contributor to the nation’s economy.

References:

Maudhui House Mobius Motors gears up for a comeback with new model launches

Maudhui House Why CMC Motors Group is closing shop in East Africa

New Vision CMC Motors winds down operations in East Africa

Launch Base Africa From Near-Closure to New Ownership: Kenya’s Mobius Motors Sold to Middle East Investors in Rescue Bid

Autos Kenya Kenya and Japan Forge Industrial Collaboration Through Policy Dialogue

African Development Bank Group, Africa’s Automotive Industry: Potential and Challenges PDF

Business Daily How Kenya can fast-track its automotive manufacturing growth


Kenyan Teachers Face Financial Crisis Amid Rising Deductions

Kenyan teachers are grappling with a severe financial squeeze as rising salary deductions drastically slash their take-home pay, fueling widespread frustration and discontent. A key point of contention is the Social Health Authority (SHA) deduction, introduced in October 2024, which mandates a 2.75% contribution from gross salaries with no cap, replacing the previous National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) system. Teachers argue that the benefits do not justify the steep increase in costs, particularly when combined with other deductions, including pension contributions, the housing levy, and higher Pay As You Earn (PAYE) taxes. A teacher in Job Group C3, for instance, now takes home as little as Ksh23,936 from a gross salary of Ksh81,584 after deductions—an alarming reduction that makes affording basic necessities increasingly difficult. These financial strains have pushed teachers into the streets, with protests and strikes becoming more frequent as they demand relief from what they perceive as excessive and unfair financial burdens. Adding to their woes, a Ksh27 billion funding shortfall in the education sector has sparked fears of salary delays, compounding the already precarious situation.

A Citizen Digital Report

The financial crisis has also extended into the healthcare sector, where teachers have been hit by severe restrictions imposed by their insurance provider, Minet. In February 2025, teachers from six North Rift counties staged a two-week strike to protest the limitations placed on their access to medical care. Many were barred from seeking treatment outside designated Level 4 and Level 5 hospitals, leading to overcrowding and reduced quality of healthcare. The Kenya National Union of Teachers (KNUT) and the Kenya Union of Post-Primary Education Teachers (KUPPET) issued a 24-hour ultimatum to the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) to address these grievances. Though the strike was called off after negotiations, many teachers remain skeptical about whether lasting solutions will be implemented. Meanwhile, teachers are still reeling from agency fee deductions imposed by the TSC in August 2024, which affected non-unionized primary school teachers, further exacerbating tensions between educators and the government. These financial deductions, coupled with a rising cost of living, have eroded the real value of teacher salaries over the years, even though Kenyan teachers remain among the best paid in East Africa. However, with over 50% of teachers concentrated in lower job groups earning between Ksh16,692 and Ksh29,918, concerns about career stagnation and wage disparity persist.

The government argues that these deductions are necessary to fund critical services and national development programs, yet teachers’ unions have fiercely opposed the lack of consultation and transparency in their implementation. Strikes and protests have become a common feature in the education sector, with KUPPET and KNUT repeatedly demanding better wages, improved working conditions, and a review of the 2021-2025 Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). The revised deductions system—implemented in phases since 2023—has seen the introduction of new NSSF rates, a 1.5% housing levy, and the removal of tax reliefs, further squeezing teachers’ earnings. The mounting dissatisfaction highlights a deeper structural issue: the delicate balance between revenue generation and employee welfare. Possible solutions include policy reforms to ease the tax burden on lower-income earners, transparent negotiations between the government and teachers’ unions, and alternative funding mechanisms such as public-private partnerships. As Kenya navigates this crisis, the outcome of these discussions will be critical in determining the future of the country’s education sector and the financial well-being of its teachers.

References:

The Standard Teachers lament over shrinking payslips as SHA deductions begin

Kenyans.co.ke Teachers Threaten Strike in 6 North Rift Counties Over Insurance

Business Daily Payslip deductions set to add burden on struggling Kenyan employees

Kenyans.co.ke Employed Kenyans Face Further Salary Decrease as SHA Deductions Take Effect

Nation Kenyan teachers not that badly paid, data shows

Business Daily Hospitals turn away teachers, police over unpaid claims