Job Scams in Kenya: A Growing Crisis

Kenya’s job seekers are under siege. As economic pressures push more young people to chase opportunities abroad or online, fraudsters are sharpening their traps — and the stakes are deadly. Sophisticated job scams, often orchestrated by transnational crime rings, are landing unsuspecting Kenyans in forced labor operations across Southeast Asia. Many are lured with fake offers, issued tourist visas instead of work permits, and end up trapped in scam compounds under brutal, enslaving conditions. Despite repeated government warnings, the scams persist, exploiting systemic weaknesses like rampant youth unemployment, weak digital literacy, and sluggish protections around labor migration. While officials stress the importance of individual due diligence — verifying agencies, double-checking job offers, demanding proper contracts — the scale of trafficking shows that better-informed individuals alone can’t stop a crisis this large. It’s a systemic failure — and it’s costing lives.

A Report by Citizen TV Kenya

At the heart of the vulnerability is a perfect storm: soaring unemployment, heavy informal sector reliance, and a government labor export strategy that prioritizes remittances over robust citizen protection. Kenya’s policies encourage labor migration — but enforcement lags behind, leaving workers exposed. Digital platforms, once hailed as tools of empowerment, have become weapons for scammers: Facebook pages, WhatsApp groups, even fake LinkedIn listings are used to lure victims. The Kenyan government’s countermeasures — the NEAIMS verification portal, bilateral labor deals, and pre-departure training — help but are patchy and slow. Civil society groups and media investigations have done much to highlight the dangers, but without aggressive enforcement and diplomatic intervention, Kenyans will keep falling prey. This is not just about digital fraud anymore; it’s about modern slavery, forced criminality, and human suffering on an industrial scale.

Solving this crisis demands a collective rethink. Government agencies must dramatically tighten recruitment regulations, shut down illegal operators, and prosecute traffickers — including those hiding behind legitimate fronts. Embassies abroad must step up protections for Kenyans, while local authorities crack down on rogue recruiters. Civil society must keep exposing the networks exploiting desperate youth, and tech companies must purge their platforms of scam ads and pages. Meanwhile, citizens must be empowered — not just blamed — with real tools to verify job offers and report suspicious activity. But real safety will only come when the Kenyan economy offers enough decent, secure jobs at home, removing the desperation that drives risky migration. Until then, job scammers will continue to thrive — and Kenyans will continue to pay the price.

References:

The Standard Job scams: Some Kenyans aiding their own smuggling, says PS Njogu

Business & Human Rights Resource Centre Kenya’s labor export model exposes workers to exploitation and other labour rights abuses

Kenyans.co.ke Govt Outlines Verification Process for Jobs Abroad as Scams Surge

The Eastleigh Voice Job scam alert: Government cautions Kenyans on fake overseas opportunities

Jijuze Rethinking Kenya’s Job Strategy: From Exports to Domestic Growth

Jijuze Kenyans Trapped: The Dark Reality of Job Scams in Myanmar

Reinstating Mathematics in Kenya’s CBC: A Necessary Shift

In March 2025, we examined the rising concerns over Kenya’s Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) rollout, where critics warned that critical academic foundations were being neglected in the rush toward specialization as discussed here. Chief among these concerns was the controversial proposal to make mathematics optional for students in the Arts & Sports Science and Social Sciences pathways at the senior secondary school level. Many stakeholders — including professional bodies, educators, and parent associations — argued that removing compulsory mathematics risked undermining students’ critical thinking, problem-solving ability, and future career flexibility. The fears were compounded by Kenya’s broader ambitions to remain competitive in a global economy increasingly shaped by STEM skills and data-driven professions. As the CBC pathways were being finalized for the Grade 10 transition starting in 2026, it became clear that significant gaps remained between the curriculum’s vision and its practical implications. It is against this backdrop that, in April 2025, the Ministry of Education announced a major policy reversal: mathematics would once again be mandatory across all senior secondary school pathways, not just for STEM students. This reinstatement signals an important shift toward reinforcing core competencies while still pursuing specialization — a recognition that a solid academic base is essential for building adaptable, future-ready graduates.

A Report by KTN News Kenya

The decision to reverse course on mathematics came after intense, organized advocacy by various stakeholder groups who viewed the optionalization of math as a dangerous policy misstep. Organizations such as the Institution of Engineers of Kenya (IEK), the Kenya Union of Post-Primary Education Teachers (KUPPET), and the Architectural Association of Kenya (AAK) were among the most vocal opponents. They collectively warned that sidelining mathematics would erode essential competencies needed across all fields, not just technical ones. Their arguments framed mathematics as the “language” underpinning modern engineering, architecture, finance, digital technology, and even the creative industries — emphasizing that basic numeracy is now a universal life skill, not a niche technical ability. During the national dialogues on CBC reforms, a strong consensus emerged that foundational subjects like mathematics cannot be optional in a 21st-century education system. CS Julius Ogamba acknowledged the impact of this feedback during the announcement, positioning the Ministry’s U-turn as evidence of a responsive government willing to adjust policy based on real-world insights. However, this shift, while welcome, also highlights earlier weaknesses in CBC policy design — suggesting that insufficient consultation with key professional sectors had left the initial plans vulnerable to critical gaps. It also underlines a broader tension within the CBC framework: the challenge of balancing meaningful specialization with maintaining a strong, common academic foundation across diverse student pathways.

To operationalize the reinstated mathematics requirement, the Ministry of Education — in collaboration with the Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development (KICD) — has adopted a differentiated model. Students following the STEM pathway will study “pure mathematics,” covering advanced concepts necessary for science and technology careers. Meanwhile, those pursuing Arts & Sports Science and Social Sciences will engage with a “simplified” or “foundational” version of mathematics aimed at building essential problem-solving and numeracy skills relevant to their fields. While this solution addresses stakeholder demands for universal mathematical literacy, it simultaneously introduces a new layer of complexity into an already strained CBC implementation process. The development of two distinct mathematics curricula will require extensive work by KICD to ensure each pathway remains rigorous and coherent. Additionally, the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) must ensure that sufficient numbers of teachers are trained and deployed to deliver differentiated mathematics instruction effectively — a tall order given existing shortages and capacity constraints highlighted in previous CBC evaluations. Schools will also need updated materials, tailored assessments from KNEC, and sufficient infrastructure to handle new teaching demands. In short, while reinstating compulsory mathematics is a vital corrective step, it magnifies the resource, training, and logistical challenges already dogging CBC’s transition. It also reinforces a broader lesson for education reform: that protecting foundational skills must remain central, even as systems innovate and specialize for a changing world.

References:

All Africa Kenya: Mathematics to Remain Compulsory in Primary and Secondary Schools

The Eastleigh Voice State makes Math mandatory for all CBC senior school learners after public outcry

The Standard Maths no longer compulsory as CBC pioneers set to pick careers

The Standard Stakeholders raise concerns over Math specialisation at Senior Schools

Capital News Mathematics to remain compulsory in primary and Secondary Schools

Jijuze Concerns Over Kenya’s Competency-Based Curriculum Implementation

2024 KCSE Certificates Release: Urgent Action Required

The Ministry of Education has announced the release of 2024 KCSE certificates, kicking off the week of April 27, 2025, a deadline that couldn’t come at a more critical time. Education CS Julius Ogamba has pressed students and guardians to pick up certificates urgently, warning that the Kenya Universities and Colleges Central Placement Service (KUCCPS) portal closes on April 30. With over 962,000 candidates having sat the exams and only 246,391 securing the minimum C+ grade needed for university admission, timely collection is non-negotiable for those hoping to lock in their higher education spots. Yet, this milestone is clouded by a stubborn and illegal practice: the continued withholding of certificates by school principals chasing unpaid fees, despite the Kenya National Examinations Council (KNEC) Act of 2012 outlawing the behavior. Top education leaders, including PS Julius Bitok and Government Spokesperson Isaac Mwaura, have slammed the practice as a violation of students’ rights, but many principals remain defiant. PS Bitok has now issued a blunt circular demanding immediate certificate release and compliance reporting within 14 days, reflecting the Ministry’s boiling frustration with rogue school heads who continue to treat legal orders as suggestions.

A Report by Kisii TV

Fed up with defiance, the Ministry is now raising the stakes, moving from warnings to hard action. CS Ogamba has made it plain: starting the week after certificates are released, principals who still withhold them will face disciplinary and legal consequences. This marks a sharp turn — no more polite memos, no more ignored directives. But even more critical is a deeper systemic fix in the works: plans are advancing to pull certificate collection entirely out of schools’ hands. Under the new model, students will pick up their documents directly from Sub-County Directors of Education (SCDE) offices, a shift that aims to kill the problem at its root. It’s a bold move, built on the successful pilot earlier this year when KCSE result slips were sent through SCDE offices. Stripping principals of the power to hold certificates hostage cuts out the middleman and restores certificates to their rightful owners — the students. Beyond logistics, this strategy is about restoring trust in the education system itself: showing that once a student earns a certificate, no one — not even a principal — should stand between them and their future.

The next few weeks will be the true test of whether this shake-up delivers real change. For the 2024 KCSE candidates, quick access to certificates is the key that unlocks university admission, job applications, and life plans that can’t wait. For principals who defy orders, this time the consequences are meant to be real — legal action, career-ending sanctions, public accountability. And for the education system as a whole, the shift to SCDE offices could become a model for breaking down entrenched administrative abuses that have long crippled student mobility. But this won’t happen automatically: it’ll require tight coordination across counties, clear instructions to SCDEs, public communication campaigns, and a Ministry willing to enforce its own rules without flinching. If it works, it will not just be a victory for this year’s candidates — it will set a new standard for fairness and efficiency in how Kenyan education treats its students. Either way, the clock is ticking, and the Ministry’s next moves will show if it’s serious about turning bold words into bold action.

References:

The Standard KCSE Certificates to be collected from government offices, not schools

Daily Nation KCSE 2024: Highest university qualifiers recorded in eight years

Kenyans.co.ke KNEC to Release 2024 KCSE Certificates This Week As KUCCPS Portal Closes

Kenyans.co.ke KCSE Certificates to Be Collected from Govt Offices Instead of Schools

The Clash Between Art and Authority in Kenyan Schools

The 2025 censorship of Echoes of War, a play by Butere Girls High School, marks a flashpoint in Kenya’s long-standing tensions between youthful artistic expression and state authority. Despite winning top honors at the Western Region level of the Kenya National Schools and Colleges Drama Festival, the play was abruptly barred from proceeding to the national stage. Written by former senator and seasoned dramatist Cleophas Malala—who also penned the previously banned Shackles of DoomEchoes of War was a bold allegory set in a fictional kingdom grappling with generational tensions and authoritarian rule. Its protagonist, Mustafa, a university student and tech innovator, challenges the regime’s rigidity with digital solutions like telemedicine, while his ally Anifa Imana mobilizes public opinion through social media. The play’s futuristic and radical tone, its incorporation of AI characters, and its critique of entrenched leadership struck a nerve with education officials. Events took a darker turn when police forcibly disrupted the school’s participation in Nakuru, deploying tear gas, arresting journalists, and detaining Malala despite a valid High Court order authorizing the play’s staging. The students’ response—singing the national anthem and then walking out—symbolized a defiant act of resistance that reverberated far beyond the festival venue, turning a school play into a national spectacle and sparking widespread outrage over the apparent state-sanctioned suppression of minors.

A Report by Nation

To understand the gravity of this moment, one must view it through the historical lens of Kenyan theatre, where censorship has long been wielded to curtail dissenting voices, especially those emanating from younger, politically aware generations. The Kenya Schools and Colleges Drama Festival, established in 1959, was originally a colonial import modeled on British educational theatre, excluding African voices until the early 1970s. It became a crucible of radical expression in the post-independence years, especially after the historic 1971 victory of Olkirkenyi, the first indigenous play to win at the national level. Throughout the late 20th century, plays became a subtle yet powerful means for students and teachers to comment on societal issues—ranging from tribalism to corruption and inequality—often using metaphor, allegory, and traditional performance styles. However, successive regimes, particularly under the KANU government and President Moi, treated such works as subversive. Prominent playwrights like Ngugi wa Thiong’o were jailed or exiled for dramatizing the suffering of the poor and critiquing the status quo. Plays like Makwekwe and Shackles of Doom were famously banned, with their writers and adjudicators fleeing or facing arrest. The state’s fear of theatre has historically stemmed from its ability to unify, mobilize, and awaken young minds—an effect amplified when performed by students within national platforms.

What happened in Nakuru in 2025 is a modern echo of this legacy, but it also highlights new dynamics in the ongoing struggle for creative freedom. Unlike past generations, today’s students are more connected, more media-literate, and more aware of their rights, particularly through digital platforms that allow them to share their voices widely and instantly. This context raises the stakes of state censorship. It is no longer just a question of restricting a school play but of suppressing a broader youth movement grounded in performance, protest, and political consciousness. The state’s justification for the ban—Malala’s role as a non-teacher and allegations of script alteration—rings hollow when contrasted with the overwhelming legal, civic, and public support for the students. The High Court’s intervention and the public’s reaction, including condemnation from Chief Justice Martha Koome, human rights organizations, and political leaders across the spectrum, reflect a society that is increasingly unwilling to tolerate authoritarian overreach in education and the arts. If anything, the incident has catalyzed a reexamination of the role of drama in education, with calls growing louder for student-centered authorship, institutional accountability, and a reformed regulatory framework that nurtures, rather than punishes, expressive courage. In this light, Echoes of War is not just a play—it is a clarion call, and how the nation responds will shape the cultural and civic landscape of Kenya’s future.

References:

Nation Echoes of War: The script of the play government doesn’t want you to watch

BBC Kenya police fire tear gas during school drama competition

Capital News Tension in Nakuru as Journalists, public barred from viewing ‘Echoes of War’ play

Citizen Digital Echoes of war: No photos or videos of Drama Festivals as Butere girls set to perform

Leveraging AI for Africa’s Growth: Key Takeaways from Kigali

The inaugural Global AI Summit for Africa in Kigali marked a pivotal moment, underscoring the continent’s ambition to become a significant player in the global artificial intelligence landscape. The summit, themed around leveraging AI for Africa’s demographic dividend, brought together leaders to discuss the immense potential of AI to drive economic growth and enhance social welfare across various sectors. From revolutionizing healthcare through AI-powered diagnostics and telemedicine to transforming education with personalized learning and breaking down language barriers, the opportunities for Africa to leapfrog traditional development stages are substantial. In agriculture, AI promises to optimize crop yields and improve resource management, while in governance, it offers tools for greater efficiency and transparency. This enthusiasm is tempered by the recognition of significant hurdles that need to be addressed for this potential to be fully realized.

A Report by France 24

Despite the bright prospects, the widespread adoption of AI in Africa faces considerable challenges. These include significant infrastructure deficits in computing power and internet connectivity, the complexity of linguistic diversity hindering the development of inclusive AI models, and limitations in the availability of high-quality, relevant data. Furthermore, a notable skills gap in AI-related fields and the imperative to establish ethical and regulatory frameworks are critical considerations. However, African innovation is already emerging to tackle these challenges. For instance, BuniAI is making strides in enhancing digital accessibility by simplifying the creation of USSD applications. This technology is particularly relevant in Africa, where basic mobile phones are prevalent, offering a crucial pathway to bridge the digital divide and deliver essential services and information to underserved populations.

The path forward for AI in Africa requires a concerted effort from governments, investors, educational institutions, and the private sector. Strategic investments in infrastructure, talent development, and the cultivation of local innovation ecosystems are crucial. Moreover, fostering strong public-private partnerships and promoting ethical AI development that is tailored to Africa’s unique context and values will be essential to ensure that the benefits of AI are inclusive and sustainable. The discussions and commitments made at the Kigali summit, coupled with the work of innovative organizations like BuniAI, signal a determined move towards harnessing the transformative power of artificial intelligence to shape a more prosperous and equitable future for the African continent.

References:

The East African Why Africa has a real chance to lead the way in AI

Malawi Ace Artificial Intelligence: Africa’s Opportunity to Leapfrog Development

African Business Global AI Summit on Africa: Can policymakers take control of AI?

Medium Buni.AI, Revolutionizing USSD Technology

Techpoint Turning AI’s opportunity into reality for Africa

Kenya’s Yellow Maize Strategy Offers Relief, But Raises Serious Public Health Concerns

Faced with a deepening maize crisis and the threat of unaffordable unga prices for millions of households, the Kenyan government has authorized the importation of yellow maize under a 50% duty waiver. The policy aims to ease the strain on white maize—Kenya’s staple grain for human consumption—by diverting demand from feed manufacturers. By encouraging millers in the animal feed industry to substitute white maize with yellow maize, the government hopes to reduce competition for white maize, making it more accessible and affordable to food processors and, ultimately, to consumers. However, this economic intervention carries unintended consequences that could undermine its goals. Due to Kenya’s fragmented supply chains and patchy enforcement mechanisms, experts warn that the clear division between maize meant for animals and that meant for humans may not hold. The significantly lower price of the imported yellow maize could tempt unscrupulous traders to redirect it into the human food market—either by blending it with white maize flour or selling it directly in low-income areas where yellow maize is already accepted as food, such as parts of Western Kenya. In places like Homa Bay County, where yellow maize is widely consumed in the form of ugali, this policy shift could unintentionally flood the food supply with grain that may not meet safety standards for human consumption.

A Report by NTV Kenya

The core of the concern lies in the persistent and well-documented threat of aflatoxin contamination, a toxic compound produced by mold that thrives in warm, humid conditions—particularly in improperly stored grains. While Kenya has established aflatoxin limits aligned with East African Community standards—10 parts per billion (ppb) for total aflatoxins and 5 ppb for aflatoxin B1—systemic challenges hinder enforcement. Many small-scale producers, informal traders, and millers lack access to the sophisticated equipment and financial resources needed to test for aflatoxins or implement preventive storage solutions. Furthermore, there have been troubling precedents that cast doubt on the robustness of regulatory oversight. In 2011, a shipment of aflatoxin-contaminated maize from the U.S. was allegedly released into the market despite being flagged by authorities, with reports suggesting that the Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS) was blocked from conducting proper inspections. More recently, in January 2025, a 2,000-tonne shipment of rice from Pakistan was found to exceed aflatoxin limits, indicating that lapses in import control remain a pressing issue. These incidents demonstrate that having regulations on paper is not enough—especially when imports labeled for animal feed, which undergo less rigorous scrutiny, may be co-opted into the human food chain in the absence of strict monitoring, reliable segregation mechanisms, and transparent accountability.

The potential health implications of increased aflatoxin exposure are grave and far-reaching, especially for vulnerable populations who rely heavily on maize as their primary food source. Acute exposure can lead to severe liver damage, jaundice, and even death, while long-term, low-level exposure is linked to liver cancer, immune system suppression, nutrient malabsorption, and developmental issues in children. Infants and young children face elevated risks due to their small body mass and the fact that complementary weaning foods are often maize-based, yet specific aflatoxin regulations for these products are either absent or poorly enforced. For populations with pre-existing liver conditions, Hepatitis B infections, or compromised immunity—such as people living with HIV—the health risks are significantly amplified. Malnourished individuals and rural subsistence farmers, who often rely on their own poorly stored harvests, are also at heightened risk. In the face of this looming danger, health advocates and food safety experts are calling on the Kenyan government to urgently invest in comprehensive and well-coordinated countermeasures. These include rigorous aflatoxin testing of all maize imports, stricter enforcement to prevent feed-grade yellow maize from entering the human food stream, large-scale public education campaigns targeting high-risk regions, and long-term investments in improved post-harvest storage infrastructure. Without such measures, the policy designed to stabilize food prices could inadvertently trigger a public health emergency—one that disproportionately affects the country’s poorest and most vulnerable.

References:

Nation Kagwe bows to pressure, opens imports as unga prices hit 13-month high

Jijuze Maize Prices Surge: Impact on Kenya’s Livestock and Food Security

Milling Middle East & Africa Kenya to halt maize, sugar imports in 2025 after achieving self-sufficiency

The Star Why state will allow importation 5.5 million bags of yellow maize – Kagwe

Randox Food Diagnostics Kenyans at risk of aflatoxin contamination as KEBS flags 2,000-tonne rice shipment

Business Daily Turn Kenya farms yellow with maize for food security







The Crisis of Unemployment in Kenya’s Psychology Sector

Kenya’s mental health sector presents a striking paradox: despite the growing recognition of mental health challenges and an increasing demand for psychological services, psychology graduates continue to face significant unemployment and underemployment. This contradiction is rooted in deep-seated structural issues that systematically undermine the profession, making it difficult for trained psychologists to secure stable, well-paying jobs. One of the primary factors contributing to this crisis is the severe lack of job opportunities within both the public and private sectors. Many organizations, including hospitals, rehabilitation centers, and educational institutions, employ only a minimal number of psychologists, often restricting these roles to one or two individuals per institution. This results in a highly competitive job market where only the most experienced professionals stand a chance of securing employment, leaving recent graduates with limited options. Additionally, the financial sustainability of private practice is severely threatened by the prevalence of free or low-cost counseling services offered by religious institutions, non-governmental organizations, and community-based groups. While these services play a crucial role in expanding access to mental healthcare, they inadvertently undermine the ability of qualified psychologists to establish viable independent practices. Consequently, many graduates are unable to leverage their expertise in the field, often resorting to working in unrelated sectors, taking on temporary and poorly remunerated jobs, or abandoning the profession altogether despite their years of specialized training.

A Citizen Digital Report on Mental Health Awareness

A major challenge compounding this issue is the lack of a structured and regulated career pathway for psychology graduates, which creates uncertainty for both practitioners and potential employers. Unlike other fields such as medicine, law, or engineering, where licensing and professional development are clearly defined, psychology remains a largely unstructured profession in Kenya. The absence of standardized guidelines for internships, supervised practice, and professional accreditation means that many graduates complete their studies without the practical experience necessary to meet employer expectations. This situation is further exacerbated by the commercialization of mental health services, where some institutions prioritize financial gain over the provision of quality care. This business-oriented approach has led to exploitative employment conditions, where psychologists are often hired on short-term contracts with little job security, minimal benefits, and unrealistic workloads. Furthermore, some rehabilitation centers and private institutions reportedly prefer hiring new graduates on temporary terms rather than renewing contracts with existing employees, ostensibly as a cost-cutting measure to avoid higher salary commitments. These systemic challenges not only create instability within the profession but also discourage qualified individuals from remaining in the field, ultimately reducing the availability of experienced professionals in the country’s mental health workforce. As a result, Kenya continues to experience a significant gap between the increasing need for psychological services and the limited number of trained professionals who can afford to remain in practice under these conditions.

Addressing these issues requires comprehensive structural reforms aimed at professionalizing the psychology field and integrating it more effectively into Kenya’s healthcare and social support systems. First, policymakers must acknowledge the critical role of psychology in national development and mental well-being by increasing investment in mental health services, expanding employment opportunities within public institutions, and ensuring that psychologists are recognized as essential healthcare providers. Universities should also play a more active role in bridging the gap between academic training and practical application by incorporating robust internship programs, mentorship opportunities, and entrepreneurial training to equip graduates with the necessary skills to navigate the job market. Additionally, regulatory bodies should establish a standardized licensing framework to ensure that all psychology professionals meet clear competency standards while also receiving fair remuneration and workplace protections. By implementing these reforms, Kenya can begin to address the persistent challenges facing psychology graduates, ensuring that their skills and expertise are fully utilized to meet the country’s growing mental health needs. Failure to take action will not only continue to render psychology graduates underemployed but will also undermine the long-term development of the mental health sector, leaving thousands of Kenyans without access to qualified psychological care at a time when it is needed more than ever.

References:

Nation Psychology graduates struggle to get jobs in Kenya

Nation THE SILENT SCREAM OF KENYA’S PSYCHOLOGY GRADUATES

The Star Tales of despair for Kenyan graduates seeking jobs

Johnson & Johnson Building health worker capacity to close the mental healthcare gap across Kenya

Assessing Kenya’s Diplomatic Neutrality in Regional Conflicts

Kenya has long positioned itself as a key mediator in East Africa, with a foreign policy prioritizing peaceful coexistence and regional stability, evidenced by its involvement in organizations like IGAD and the EAC . While historically successful in mediating conflicts, such as the Sudanese Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2005, recent diplomatic forays under President Ruto have encountered significant headwinds . Initiatives in the Democratic Republic of Congo, including bringing the DRC into the EAC and leading the EAC Regional Force, have been marred by accusations of bias and a lack of trust from Kinshasa, particularly concerning the handling of rebel groups . Similarly, Kenya’s hosting of Sudanese Rapid Support Forces meetings has drawn strong condemnation from the Sudanese government, which views it as a hostile act, further damaging Kenya’s image as a neutral broker in regional disputes . These challenges underscore a potential shift in regional perceptions of Kenya’s diplomatic impartiality, which could have implications for its ongoing efforts in other conflict zones.

A Report by Citizen Digital

Against this backdrop, Kenya launched the Tumaini Initiative in May 2024, a high-level mediation process aimed at addressing the protracted crisis in South Sudan by engaging hold-out groups that did not sign the 2018 peace agreement . Led by veteran mediator General Lazarus Sumbeiywo, the initiative seeks to reboot the existing peace deal, extend its implementation timeline, and potentially pave the way for delayed elections . While initial talks saw agreement on a negotiation agenda focusing on the root causes of the conflict, the identity of parties, the relationship with the existing peace agreement, and power-sharing arrangements, the process has faced significant hurdles . Key opposition groups, such as the South Sudan Opposition Movement Alliance (SSOMA), have rejected the Kenyan mediation, arguing that it fails to address the fundamental issues fueling the conflict . This skepticism, coupled with the deep-seated political instability, the ongoing humanitarian crisis exacerbated by the war in Sudan, and the slow progress in implementing the 2018 agreement, casts a shadow over the potential for the Tumaini Initiative to achieve a comprehensive and lasting peace.

The effectiveness of Kenya’s diplomatic mission in South Sudan hinges on several critical factors, including its ability to rebuild trust and demonstrate neutrality, foster a truly inclusive dialogue that addresses the grievances of all stakeholders, and secure sustained commitment from South Sudanese leaders . International reaction to the Tumaini Initiative has been cautiously supportive, with organizations like the UN emphasizing the importance of regional support from Kenya while also expressing growing concern over the deteriorating situation in South Sudan . Expert analysis suggests that while the initiative offers a glimmer of hope by aiming to address the root causes of the conflict, the history of failed peace talks and the persistent lack of political will among South Sudanese leaders remain significant obstacles . Ultimately, for Kenya’s efforts to yield lasting results, a concerted and collaborative approach involving regional and international partners, coupled with a genuine commitment from all South Sudanese parties to prioritize peace and stability over political gains, will be essential to navigate the complex landscape and break the cycle of conflict.

References:

Aljazeera Peacemaker or peacebreaker? Why Kenya’s good neighbour reputation is marred

Kenyan Foreign Policy Ruto’s Premature Diplomacy Faces Regional Pushback in DRC Mediation Efforts

The East African Only Ruto has power on foreign policy direction

Aljazeera South Sudan on brink of renewed civil war, UN warns

Aljazeera UN warns of conflict in South Sudan amid reports of VP Riek Machar’s arrest

Xinhua Kenya vows to prioritize regional integration, security with global partners

Understanding Kosovo’s Quest for Global Acceptance and Territorial Issues

Kosovo’s journey to full international acceptance has been a protracted one since its declaration of independence from Serbia in 2008. While the newly formed nation garnered significant early recognition, the momentum has noticeably slowed in recent years, marked by a near five-year lull in any new countries formally acknowledging its sovereignty. This period of stagnation ended abruptly with Kenya’s announcement on March 26, 2025, making it the latest nation to recognize Kosovo. This diplomatic move, however, has not been without its challenges. Serbia, which continues to view Kosovo as its own territory, reacted with strong condemnation, accusing Kenya of violating international law and United Nations resolutions. This development throws a spotlight on the complex web of international relations surrounding Kosovo and the delicate balance countries must strike when deciding on recognition.

A Report by WawamuStats

The primary reasons for the limited and slowing recognition of Kosovo are deeply rooted in the ongoing opposition from Serbia, which views Kosovo’s independence as a direct assault on its territorial integrity and national sovereignty. This stance is powerfully supported by Serbia’s allies, Russia and China, both of whom hold veto power in the UN Security Council, effectively blocking Kosovo’s membership in the United Nations. This lack of UN membership significantly hinders Kosovo’s full integration into the global community. Furthermore, several European Union member states, including Spain, Slovakia, Cyprus, Romania, and Greece, have also withheld recognition, often citing concerns about territorial integrity and potential precedents for their own domestic issues. This intricate geopolitical landscape, where historical ties, strategic alliances, and concerns about sovereignty intersect, has created a significant hurdle for Kosovo in its pursuit of universal recognition.

Kenya’s decision to break the prolonged silence on Kosovo’s recognition has been met with immediate diplomatic fallout. Serbia has vehemently criticized the move, warning of damage to the long-standing friendly relations between the two nations and vowing to take diplomatic and political measures in response. Domestically, in Kenya, concerns have been raised about potential economic and diplomatic repercussions, with some fearing that this decision could isolate the country on the global stage. While Kenya’s government has defended its recognition by citing the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion that Kosovo’s declaration of independence did not violate international law, the move underscores the contentious nature of Kosovo’s statehood and the potential diplomatic minefield that nations navigate when choosing to recognize its independence.

References:

Aljazeera Which countries recognise Kosovo’s statehood?

Capital News Serbia vows diplomatic response to Kenya’s recognition of Kosovo

Capital News Foreign Relations Committee member faults Kosovo recognition

Kosovapress Recognition from Kenya brings back criticism of the government: Four years of lobbying failure at the international level

EACOP Insights: Funding Strategies for Kenya’s Oil Sector

In a significant stride for East African energy, Uganda’s ambitious East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project has recently secured a crucial funding boost, signaling a move towards the realization of this multi-billion dollar infrastructure. This development offers a wealth of insights for neighboring Kenya, which also harbors considerable aspirations in the oil and gas sector. While Uganda’s EACOP has navigated a complex landscape of financing challenges and environmental concerns to reach this milestone, Kenya’s own oil development plans, particularly in the South Lokichar basin, have faced delays and the withdrawal of key investors. The contrasting progress underscores a valuable opportunity for Kenya to learn from Uganda’s experience, especially in securing the necessary financial backing and managing the intricate environmental and social considerations that come with large-scale energy projects. As Kenya seeks to tap into its hydrocarbon resources for economic growth, the strategies employed and the hurdles overcome by the EACOP project provide a compelling case study in the realities of the regional energy landscape.

A Report by EACOP (March 2025)

Several key lessons emerge for Kenya from Uganda’s journey. Securing funding in an era of increasing climate consciousness requires a diversified approach, potentially looking beyond traditional Western financial institutions to engage with regional banks and explore partnerships with entities that have different investment priorities. Furthermore, proactively addressing environmental and social concerns through transparent impact assessments, robust mitigation plans, and genuine community engagement is paramount to minimize opposition and enhance project bankability. Uganda’s experience highlights the critical need for a strong and consistent government commitment, coupled with a stable and predictable regulatory environment, to build investor confidence. For Kenya, this means streamlining regulatory processes, ensuring policy consistency, and prioritizing the implementation of stringent environmental standards and community-focused initiatives from the outset. Building strong and stable relationships with international oil companies, ensuring transparency in agreements, and investing in essential infrastructure are also crucial takeaways for Kenya as it navigates the complexities of developing its oil and gas sector.

However, Uganda’s EACOP project has not been without its challenges, facing significant environmental opposition and concerns about social displacement. These potential pitfalls offer further learning points for Kenya. Proactive engagement with environmental stakeholders, prioritizing fair compensation and resettlement plans for affected communities, and striving for maximum transparency in all aspects of the oil and gas sector are essential to avoid similar controversies. Kenya must also be mindful of the broader risks associated with resource extraction, such as the “resource curse,” and implement sound economic policies to ensure long-term sustainable development. By carefully analyzing Uganda’s experience – both its successes in securing funding and the controversies it has faced – Kenya can strategically refine its own approach to oil and gas development, aiming for a path that is both economically beneficial and environmentally and socially responsible, ultimately positioning itself as a stable and attractive player in the regional energy market.

References:

Reuters Uganda’s $5 billion EACOP pipeline gets funding boost

Monitor EACOP secures funding as Uganda eyes oil production next year 

Jijuze Kenya’s Oil and Gas Ambitions: Opportunities and Challenges

Pumps Africa Kenya to restart licensing of oil and gas blocks

UN Environment Programme Greasing the wheels of Kenya’s nascent oil and gas sector

Pipeline & Gas Journal EACOP Secures First Tranche of Funding for $5 Billion Uganda-Tanzania Pipeline