Tag Archives: News

news

The First Law of Politico-Dynamics: Power Is Never Lost, Only Transformed

Posted on by

What’s something you believe everyone should know.

One of the greatest truths in both physics and politics is this: power never disappears—it merely changes form. Just as energy can neither be created nor destroyed, political power, too, is a conserved force that shifts, mutates, and re-emerges. Tanzania’s recent history is a masterclass in this invisible law. Under the late President John Magufuli, the country witnessed a deliberate compression of democratic energy. Opposition rallies were banned, media voices silenced, and civil liberties choked under an increasingly authoritarian grip. The 2020 general elections—tainted by accusations of fraud and intimidation—did not destroy dissent; they simply converted it into dormant potential energy, locked within the state’s total control. What appeared as political dominance was, in essence, the gathering of immense pressure beneath the surface of the republic.

When Magufuli passed away in 2021 and Vice President Samia Suluhu Hassan took over, that compressed energy found a new expression. For a moment, Tanzania seemed to exhale. Political dialogue resumed, exiled opposition leaders like Tundu Lissu returned, and the media regained a measure of freedom. Yet this was not the dismantling of power but its phase shift—a transformation from brute coercion to soft diplomacy. The ruling party, CCM, maintained its institutional grip, only trading kinetic repression for the subtler currency of legitimacy and international goodwill. Tanzania’s newfound openness was real, but it was carefully managed; the core quantum of control remained untouched. The machinery of power, having changed its form, retained its full magnitude, calibrated now for persuasion instead of fear.

By 2023, the cycle completed itself. The language of reform gave way once more to the mechanics of control. Opposition figures were again entangled in legal webs, critics silenced through procedural precision, and the state’s energy of dominance reappeared cloaked in legality. The lesson is universal: no political power is ever destroyed—it only transforms. What matters is not whether power exists, but how it is expressed, shared, and held accountable. Citizens must therefore act as the catalysts of transformation, ensuring that this energy—inevitable, immense, and perpetual—remains a force for justice rather than repression. The equation, always, must balance.

The Watchers of the Digital Republic: Kenya’s Quiet March Into a Surveillance State

Posted on by

Kenya is watching itself — pixel by pixel. Over the last five years, the country has built an unseen digital nervous system linking thousands of Huawei-powered Safe City cameras, police databases, and social-media monitoring tools. From downtown Nairobi to Mombasa’s seafront, every movement can be captured and cross-checked within seconds at the National Police Service Command Centre. Officials hail this as “smart security”; critics call it the birth of an algorithmic state. It is now evident that Kenya’s system is among the most extensive in sub-Saharan Africa — facial recognition, automatic number-plate readers, and voice analytics feeding a real-time surveillance web. Civil-rights groups such as Article 19 Eastern Africa warn that the same technologies meant to protect citizens are increasingly used to watch them, often without consent or transparency.

The legal architecture meant to contain this power is full of blind spots. The Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act 2024 widened government interception powers and allowed the Communications Authority to pull down online content on loosely defined “security” grounds. Meanwhile, the National Intelligence Service runs data-fusion platforms that combine SIM registration, mobile-money, and tax records — none of which fall under the Data Protection Act’s civilian oversight. The Office of the Data Protection Commissioner cannot audit national-security operations, leaving surveillance programs completely opaque. As the Kenya Human Rights Commission noted in an April 2024 brief, “privacy protections collapse precisely where the State holds the most data.” In the name of safety, a culture of monitoring has replaced a culture of accountability.

Kenya’s experiment is shaping regional norms. The Huawei model first tested in Nairobi has now appeared in Ethiopia, Uganda, and Tanzania, while Western donors — from the EU to Interpol — fund “cyber-capacity” projects that quietly expand the same infrastructure. Analysts describe this as a surveillance compromise: Eastern hardware, Western money, African data. What began as a modernization effort has become a mirror of global power politics — a democracy borrowing the tools of autocracy to stay secure. Unless Parliament enacts a Surveillance Oversight Law and empowers independent audits, Kenya risks institutionalizing fear as policy. The technology that promised protection now records obedience, and in this new digital republic one truth persists: the cameras no longer blink — they remember.

References:

Article 19 Eastern Africa Surveillance, data protection, and freedom of expression in Kenya and Uganda during COVID-19

The Kenyan Wall Street Kenya Upgrades Cybercrime Law to Hand Gov’t Sweeping Powers to Block Websites

The Star Controversial Cybercrime Act: What they said

Huawei Safaricom：Enhancing Security in Kenya with Huawei’s Converged Command & Control Solution

Africa – China Reporting Project Huawei’s surveillance tech in Kenya: A safe bet?

Coda Story In Africa’s first ‘safe city,’ surveillance reigns

The Conversation State surveillance: Kenyans have a right to privacy – does the government respect it?

BBC Safe cities: Using smart tech for public security




The Future Grid: Where Africa’s Power and Politics Collide.

Posted on by

Africa’s energy landscape is shifting faster than at any time in its postcolonial history. From North Africa’s nuclear ventures to Southern Africa’s hydrogen ambitions, the continent is quietly constructing a new map of power — one defined not by oil reserves, but by grid capacity and global alliances. Russia and China are embedding influence through nuclear partnerships; the United States and Europe counter with renewables and clean-tech financing. Across the continent, energy has become the new currency of diplomacy. The story is no longer about light bulbs and power stations — it’s about sovereignty, soft power, and survival. And in this unfolding drama, Kenya stands at the intersection of ambition and caution, armed with geothermal prowess, nuclear dreams, and the burden of fiscal fragility.

Kenya’s choices now echo far beyond its borders. Once hailed as Africa’s renewable beacon, the nation’s dual pursuit of nuclear energy and grid modernization could redefine East Africa’s energy future — or divide it. Egypt’s El-Dabaa reactor is already nearing completion; South Africa is upgrading its Koeberg plant; and Uganda and Ghana are moving from feasibility to formal partnerships. Kenya, strategically perched in the Eastern Africa Power Pool, holds the potential to become a regional energy exporter, a stabilizer in a volatile market. Yet that promise hinges on policy discipline and trust — two currencies Kenya is struggling to sustain. Its fiscal instability, opaque power contracts, and political indecision risk eroding the credibility needed to lead the continental transition. The dream of an integrated African grid may depend less on megawatts and more on governance — and Kenya’s ability to align vision with viability.

The next decade will determine whether Kenya emerges as a powerful nation or merely a powered one. To lead Africa’s energy race, it must balance ambition with accountability, geopolitics with pragmatism. This is not just about building reactors or expanding wind farms — it’s about mastering the grid as an instrument of economic independence and continental diplomacy. The nuclear plant, if realized, will stand not merely as a symbol of technological progress, but as a test of strategic maturity. For Africa, and Kenya especially, the energy race is no longer about who generates power — it’s about who commands it. The atom, the turbine, and the tariff are now the instruments of influence. Kenya’s gamble could define not just its own future, but the direction of Africa’s entire energy destiny.

References:

Sollay Kenyan Foundation Navigating the Challenges of Kenya’s Energy Crisis in 2025

Semafor Africa’s top bank has a fresh chance to bet on nuclear

Observer Research Foundation Advantage China in Africa’s nuclear energy market race

Intellinews More than 20 African countries exploring potential of nuclear energy – IAEA report

IEA Kenya’s energy sector is making strides toward universal electricity access, clean cooking solutions and renewable energy development

Daily Nation Why Kenya is losing its position as regional energy sector leader

The Algorithm and the Republic — Kenya’s Reckoning with AI Governance

Posted on by

When a private company’s neural nets began to unmask the hidden flows inside M-Pesa, the discovery jolted more than the fintech sector — it forced Kenya to confront a systemic question: who watches the watchers, and on what rules? The rollout of AI-driven compliance tools at Safaricom was never merely a tech upgrade; it arrived as part of a national emergency — a response to international pressure, spiralling fraud, and regulatory failure. The Financial Action Task Force’s increased-monitoring designation and months of global scrutiny had already pushed lawmakers and regulators into a sprint of reforms; industry actors answered with models that could learn patterns humans could not. But those same models required data — vast, granular, and often personal — and the legal scaffolding for such access was changing in real time. Kenya’s recent cyber-law overhaul and parliamentary amendments to the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act expanded state powers over online infrastructure, tightened penalties for SIM-swap and phishing offences, and gave the National Computer and Cybercrimes Coordination Committee sweeping directive authority over platforms and applications. Those moves addressed real harms — SIM swap fraud, phishing, and mass laundering — but they also recalibrated the balance between surveillance and rights.

Video Courtesy: The Kenyan Wall Street Youtube Channel

That recalibration is tested in the day-to-day rub of enforcement. Regulators and the ODPC have begun to draw lines: the Data Protection Commissioner’s recent ruling against a major betting operator for excessive data demands underscores the point that AML objectives cannot be a carte blanche for limitless intrusion. In the Betika case the ODPC found the company’s demand for three months of a user’s M-Pesa statements at account-closure to be disproportionate and ordered compensation, signalling that data-minimisation and privacy remain legally enforceable even amid AML pressures. At the same time, FATF’s 2025 monitoring guidance — and independent analysis from ISS Africa — make plain that Kenya must also show measurable results in prosecutions, beneficial-ownership transparency, and risk-based supervision of non-financial entities (including gambling and virtual assets) if it is to repair global confidence. The practical implication is blunt: Kenya cannot satisfy international partners by papering laws alone; enforcement and proportionate procedural safeguards must accompany technical surveillance. Otherwise the country risks swapping one reputational problem (grey-listing) for another — a domestic legitimacy crisis born of heavy-handed data practices.

So where does Kenya go from here? The answer lies in design choices — legal, technical, and institutional — that make accountability a feature, not an afterthought. We recommend three urgent, interlocking reforms that turn the AI question into a governance opportunity: (1) Purpose-bound, time-limited data access. AML or security queries should be scoped narrowly and logged; full transaction histories must not be a default feed into private models. (2) Explainability + redress. Any automated decision that materially affects a person (account freezes, cash-outs blocked, KYC escalations) must carry a succinct, non-technical rationale and a fast appeals channel routed through an independent body. (3) Joint independent oversight. Operationalize a statutory ODPC–FRC technical review board with public reporting obligations, the power to audit both models and data requests, and a mandate to publish redaction and retention metrics. These are not frictionless reforms — they will slow some processes and impose costs — but that trade-off is precisely the point: legitimacy costs less than lost trust. If Kenya stitches these protections into law and practice — and couples them with meaningful prosecution of financial crimes and improved beneficial-ownership registers — it can convert the awkward moment of global scrutiny into a first-mover advantage: an African model of rights-based, explainable AI governance for financial systems. The choices made now will decide whether Kenya’s algorithms become instruments of accountability or mechanisms that hollow out public trust.

References:

Business Daily Security or surveillance? How amended cyber law could reshape Kenya’s online space

Daily Nation How AI can close trust gaps in Africa’s financial systems

The Kenyan Wall Street How Safaricom is Leveraging AI to Bolster M-Pesa Security and Efficiency

Business Daily What FATF grey-listing means for Kenya

The Enigma of Power — Raila Odinga and the Paradox of Influence Without Office

Posted on by

History rarely rewards those who come close — but in Raila Odinga’s case, proximity itself became the point of power. For more than four decades, Raila lived at the edge of power yet shaped every regime from within the shadows of opposition. He was, as The Africa Report aptly put it, “the man who lost every election but won Kenya’s democracy.” From the twilight of Daniel arap Moi’s rule to the dawn of Kenya’s multiparty renaissance, Raila’s defiance never waned — earning him both fear and reverence in equal measure. In 2002, when KANU’s dominance finally cracked, it was his dramatic declaration of “Kibaki Tosha” that propelled Mwai Kibaki to State House and ushered in the first peaceful transfer of power in Kenya’s history. Yet even in victory, Raila remained the outsider: betrayed by broken coalition promises, sidelined by those he helped elect. Still, he never relinquished the moral authority of the people’s voice. In 2005, his “Orange” movement defeated Kibaki’s draft constitution — a rare case of an opposition leader reshaping national destiny without holding office. And when the 2007 elections collapsed into violence, it was again Raila’s resilience that forced Kenya back from the brink, transforming a disputed vote into a dialogue for survival. Through pain, loss, and endurance, he became less a politician and more a barometer of Kenya’s democratic conscience — the man who could lose and still lead.

Raila's political influence over time

Raila’s power was never institutional; it was cultural, narrative, and profoundly human. He understood Kenya’s pulse — and weaponised symbolism like few before him. His aliases — Agwambo, Tinga, Baba — transcended politics, morphing into collective identities of resistance, belonging, and hope. His supporters saw in him their own unfulfilled promise; his rivals, a reminder that legitimacy cannot be decreed. Each administration that followed — from Kibaki to Kenyatta to Ruto — has been shaped, challenged, or legitimised by Raila’s political presence. As Prime Minister in the 2008 Grand Coalition, he co-supervised the nation’s reconstruction after post-election chaos and championed reforms that birthed the 2010 Constitution — arguably his greatest institutional legacy. That charter redefined Kenyan governance, devolving power to the counties and embedding civil rights into law, echoing the principles for which he had once been jailed. Later, his controversial 2018 “Handshake” with President Uhuru Kenyatta ended months of unrest following the disputed 2017 polls and restored political calm — though it also fractured his traditional support base. Yet, even that act reinforced his lifelong philosophy: that peace, not position, defines statesmanship. His later appointment as the African Union’s High Representative for Infrastructure confirmed his continental stature — a statesman recognised beyond Kenya’s borders for blending political endurance with technocratic vision.

In the end, Raila Odinga’s paradox was not that he failed to capture the presidency, but that he redefined what power itself means in a fragile democracy. His defeats never diminished his influence; they amplified it. Every president who took office did so under the long shadow of his moral authority. He forced institutions to evolve, compelled courts to assert independence, and transformed the vocabulary of opposition into the grammar of governance. In his twilight years, even adversaries acknowledged that Kenya’s political story could not be told without him — that every victory or reform bore his fingerprints somewhere beneath the surface. He was both architect and agitator, healer and heretic, rebel and reformer. Raila Odinga never occupied State House, but he changed what it stood for — from a fortress of fear to a house answerable to its citizens. And as the nation continues to wrestle with the legacy of leadership and legitimacy, his life offers a sobering truth: that true power is not seized, but earned — and sometimes, it lives longest in the hands of those who never hold the crown.

References:

The Africa Report Raila Odinga: The man who lost every election but won Kenya’s democracy

The Star Raila Odinga: The man who changed Kenya without ever ruling it

The Star Most consequential politician in history of Kenya bows out

All Africa Kenya Mourns Raila Odinga ‘The President’ It Never Had

TRT World Raila Odinga: Kenya’s political enigma never left the stage


The Passing of a Titan — Raila Odinga and the National Mourning

Posted on by

When the news broke that Raila Amolo Odinga had breathed his last, Kenya did not just lose a leader — it lost a paradox made flesh. He was the man who never won the presidency, yet arguably won the soul of Kenya’s democracy — the one who lost every major election but gained the moral authority few in power ever matched. Across towns and villages, in markets and offices, a shared stillness settled like evening dew — part disbelief, part reverence. Television stations turned monochrome; social feeds filled with memories of rallies, reform, and resilience. From Kibera to Kisumu, from Nairobi to Namanga, Raila’s name echoed in chants of grief and gratitude. He was more than a politician; he was the pulse of a people who found in him the courage to speak, to dissent, and to dream. To many, Raila Odinga was Kenya’s moral compass — the man who, even in loss, made millions believe in the promise of justice.

As the state prepared to honour him, the weight of history pressed against the walls of memory. Here was a man who had been imprisoned for ideals, tortured for his convictions, yet emerged each time more resolute than before. The tributes flowing in from across Africa captured this paradox of pain and purpose — Tanzania’s President calling him “the conscience of East Africa,” Nigeria’s Senate hailing him as “a reformer who saw power as duty, not privilege.” In Nairobi, the national flag flew at half-mast, while Parliament prepared to host what may be the most emotionally charged state funeral in decades. But behind the ceremonies lay a deeper reckoning — the realization that Kenya’s democratic soul was, in many ways, shaped by one man’s endurance. To chronicle Raila’s life is to trace the country’s long struggle between oppression and reform, silence and voice, fear and freedom.

And now, in death, his story returns to the people who carried him for half a century — the voters who called him “Baba,” the youth who painted his slogans, the rivals who feared yet respected him. His passing is not just a political event; it is a national rite of reflection — a chance for Kenya to measure how far it has come, and how far it still must go to realize the ideals he fought for. In the coming posts of this legacy series, we will explore those ideals — from his days in detention to his time as Prime Minister, from his Pan-African mission to his unfinished democratic dream. Raila Odinga’s journey did not end with his last breath; it endures in the conscience of a nation still learning to live up to the ideals he refused to abandon. Stay with us as we begin this national remembrance — a chronicle of courage, conviction, and continuity.

References:

BBC ‘Father of our democracy’: Kenya’s Raila Odinga dies in India aged 80

The Standard Raila Odinga’s death: What the world is saying

France 24 Kenya opposition leader Raila Odinga dies, sparking emotion, uncertainty

Daily Nation Raila Odinga dies at age 80 in India

Privacy vs. Security — Kenya’s New Surveillance Dilemma

Posted on by

Kenya’s abrupt pivot to algorithmic oversight has exposed a wrenching trade-off: the same machines that can trace illicit flows also watch citizens’ everyday lives. As Safaricom’s AI began mapping transaction behaviors and regulators demanded real-time feeds, private data that once moved only between users and platforms is now visible to a new ecosystem of state and corporate watchers. That visibility matters: behavioural scoring, timing analysis, and API logs can unmask syndicates — but they can also profile law-abiding users, freeze livelihoods, or expose sensitive patterns (medical payments, political donations, remittance partners). In practice, this tension has a name and a face: legitimate attempts to close laundering loopholes (especially in betting and mobile lending) have collided with privacy norms codified under Kenya’s Data Protection laws and enforced by the Data Protection Commissioner. The friction is no longer theoretical — it plays out in court rulings and public grievances, where an automated alert can instantly strand a small-business owner awaiting payroll, or a migrant worker trying to send school fees home.

One high-profile example is the case involving Betika, which was ordered to pay KSh 250,000 for breaching data privacy rules. The ruling found that Betika had improperly processed users’ personal data without sufficient protections or lawful grounds. This case highlights a critical danger: when betting platforms (already under AML scrutiny) become nodes of state data demand, weak privacy compliance means corporate actors — not just regulators — can overreach data collection and usage, compounding surveillance risk. The Betika ruling proved that courts are willing to hold fintech operators accountable, but the scale of risk grows when those same APIs feed into AI-driven compliance systems without clear limits or safeguards.

The policy question is therefore blunt: how do you operationalize intrusive yet effective AML tools without creating a surveillance grid that punishes innocents? The answer requires more than slogans. It begins with strict, purpose-limited access: authorities and private partners should get only the minimal data needed to investigate a flagged flow — not full transaction histories. It requires explainable AI, where users receive understandable notices about why their wallet was flagged, and a clear appeals process exists. It demands robust oversight: the ODPC and FRC must enforce audit protocols, redress mechanisms, and limits on data retention and use. The Betika precedent is a warning: tightening oversight without privacy guardrails risks turning compliance into exclusion and exposing digital citizens to data abuse. Kenya now stands at a critical juncture: Will it build a system where enforcement respects rights — or drift into a regime where surveillance becomes default, and trust becomes collateral damage? In our next post, we’ll explore how to build explainable AI and regulatory harmony — practical steps to reconcile compliance, innovation, and rights.

References:

iGamingToday Betika ordered to pay KSh 250,000 for breaching data privacy rules

Subex How AI and Analytics Are Revolutionizing Fraud Detection in Mobile Money

Thomson Reuters AML challenges in evolving threat landscape, says ACAMS report

Techcabal How Safaricom’s AI exposed money laundering in Kenya’s betting boom

Kenya’s Labor Crisis: Governance Failure and Fiscal Discipline

Posted on by

At the heart of Kenya’s endless labor unrest lies a contradiction the state has refused to confront: it preaches fiscal discipline while institutionalizing non-compliance. The Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC) — the body constitutionally mandated to manage public wage policy — has become a paradox of design: all authority, no enforcement. It issues guidelines that ministries and counties cite when cornered but ignore when expedient. Its circulars on pay harmonization and job evaluation are routinely undermined by politically negotiated allowances, ad hoc promotions, and extra-legal CBAs signed under pressure. The result is a regulatory void where fiscal control is performative and accountability optional. SRC’s power is largely symbolic — a watchdog muzzled by law and outpaced by politics — while the wage bill continues to balloon, not because of policy ignorance, but because institutions have learned how to outmaneuver oversight.

The National Treasury sits at the center of this dysfunction, weaponizing scarcity while mismanaging prioritization. Its annual insistence on fiscal prudence rings hollow against a record of delayed disbursements, unpaid CBA arrears, and selective funding of politically strategic programs. Treasury’s budgeting cycle has effectively become a tool of containment — a means to manage unrest rather than reform systems. When doctors, teachers, or civil servants strike, it is rarely due to wage greed; it is because their legally negotiated agreements remain unfunded despite formal approval. The Treasury’s pattern of signing off on CBAs without allocating corresponding funds has turned the entire labor framework into a credibility trap. Each unhonored agreement erodes faith not just in the fiscal system, but in the idea that government commitments are binding at all. This chronic underfunding blurs the line between austerity and abdication — and in doing so, transforms fiscal caution into a breeding ground for revolt.

The compliance gap that emerges from this broken triangle — SRC, Treasury, and the implementing ministries or counties — is not administrative; it is existential. Each actor claims procedural innocence while collectively ensuring systemic failure. Ministries invoke budget ceilings; counties plead disbursement delays; SRC blames its limited mandate — and the Labor Ministry, the one body meant to arbitrate, has devolved into a crisis registrar. This institutional buck-passing is now a defining feature of Kenya’s governance culture. It explains why industrial action has become cyclical, why courts are perpetually mediating CBAs, and why public trust continues to collapse. Investors see it too: the volatility of Kenya’s labor market is not caused by worker militancy, but by the state’s refusal to honor its own laws. The strikes are symptoms — the disease is compliance failure dressed up as fiscal discipline. Until Kenya reforms the machinery of accountability between its fiscal and labor institutions, economic stability will remain an illusion built on broken promises.

References:

Daily Nation How bloated wage bills are choking counties and stalling development

Daily Nation A nation of protests and strikes

Business Daily Civil servants sue SRC over freezes on pay reviews

Health Sector Flashpoints — When Counties Betray Care

Posted on by

Kenya’s public health system is once again on the operating table — but this time, the diagnosis points beyond fiscal failure to institutional betrayal. The government’s May 2024 payout of KSh 3.5 billion in doctors’ arrears briefly restored faith in the state’s willingness to honor past commitments under the 2017–2024 CBA. Yet, beneath the celebration, cracks widened. Barely weeks later, the same administration plunged the sector into chaos over the medical interns’ stipend standoff, slashing agreed pay from KSh 206,400 to 70,000 under the guise of “limited fiscal space.” The ensuing paralysis—interns idled, courts flooded with petitions, hospitals short-staffed—signaled not financial constraint but a governance culture that governs by deferral, treating legality and professionalism as expendable luxuries. What should have been a steady reform agenda has degenerated into episodic crisis management, where every partial solution simply queues up the next emergency.

The deterioration has now metastasized to the counties, where devolved power has mutated into deflection and denial. In Kiambu County, doctors have been on strike for months, accusing the governor of presiding over a “battle of egos” instead of a rescue plan. (The Standard) The Kenya Medical Practitioners, Pharmacists and Dentists Union (KMPDU) has condemned county governments for “derailing progress” by ignoring CBAs, delaying salaries, and politicizing healthcare delivery. The union’s outrage spiked after reports that 131 newborns died amid the Kiambu crisis, a tragedy the Council of Governors publicly dismissed as “false publication.” (Citizen Digital) The KMPDU now demands accountability, an apology, and an independent investigation—warning of a nationwide strike on October 25 if county impunity persists. What began as a county dispute has evolved into a national indictment of how devolution, once hailed as reform, has devolved into an administrative minefield where human life becomes collateral to political vanity.

This crisis extends far beyond Kiambu — it is metastasizing across the entire devolved health network, revealing a structural rot that no press release can conceal. Health workers in Nairobi, Isiolo, Marsabit, and other counties are already on edge over delayed salaries, missing allowances, and ignored CBAs, while local leaders deflect responsibility with ritual blame games. Each county now operates like a fiefdom, where governors weaponize fiscal autonomy to evade national accountability. The result is a patchwork of suffering: hospitals running without drugs, maternity wards closing for lack of staff, and patients dying quietly as politicians trade televised barbs. In this grotesque inversion of priorities, doctors and nurses must fight court battles simply to be paid, while the state spends millions staging health summits and PR drives about universal care. The moral decay runs deeper than bureaucratic failure — it is ethical bankruptcy. Devolution was meant to bring services closer to the people; instead, it has brought corruption closer to the patient. The Council of Governors, once the face of localized empowerment, now functions as a shield for negligence, dismissing human tragedies as “falsehoods” even when families bury their dead. A government that forces doctors back to work through court orders, instead of dialogue, has abdicated the very essence of governance. Every delayed salary and every stillborn infant is a symptom of a political elite desensitized to suffering — one that governs not through service, but through spectacle. Unless the state reclaims discipline, compassion, and coherence in health governance, Kenya’s pursuit of universal healthcare will remain a hollow slogan floating over a silent emergency ward.

References:

The Standard Battle of egos: Counties accused of derailing progress in health sector

Citizen Digital KMPDU slams Governors over Kiambu health crisis, issues demands amid looming national strike

The Standard Doctors to join their striking Kiambu colleagues starting Wednesday

Finn Partners The Evolution of Healthcare in Kenya Amidst Doctor’s Strike and the Rise of Digital Health Innovations

TV47 Kenya Trust deficit is Kenya Kwanza’s greatest undoing” – MP Makali Mulu

Understanding Kenya’s Labor Unrest: Beyond Government Missteps

Posted on by

Kenya’s labor unrest cannot be fully explained by the Kenya Kwanza administration’s missteps alone. The deeper roots of today’s incessant strikes lie in structural shifts unleashed by the 2010 Constitution. By embedding strong labor rights—including the freedom to unionize, collectively bargain, and strike—while simultaneously devolving key government functions, the Constitution created both an empowered workforce and a fragmented system of accountability. These changes reshaped labor relations across education and health, planting the seeds for recurrent clashes between workers, unions, and the state.

Nowhere is this clearer than in the health sector. When the 2010 Constitution devolved primary and secondary health services to 47 county governments, it fractured the once-unified employer-employee relationship between health unions and the state. Doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals suddenly faced a dual negotiation front: the national Ministry of Health and individual county governors. This decentralization introduced ambiguity about who should fund or enforce collective bargaining agreements (CBAs), fueling a wave of prolonged nationwide strikes. The infamous 2016–2017 standoff—where doctors and nurses collectively downed tools for nearly a year, resulting in 250 lost strike days—exemplified how devolution multiplied points of conflict rather than streamlining accountability.

By contrast, the education sector retained a centralized structure under the Teachers Service Commission (TSC). While this avoided the maze of devolved negotiations, it meant that disputes often escalated into high-stakes, nationwide confrontations. Teachers’ unions, dealing with a single employer, have consistently locked horns with the TSC over promotions, career progression, and salary schemes. Despite this centralization, the state has still failed to fund signed CBAs adequately, proving that the conflict is not just about institutional design but also about political will. Ultimately, the post-2010 constitutional settlement entrenched a dual dilemma: fragmentation in devolved sectors like health, and high-stakes concentration in centralized sectors like education—both of which ensure that labor unrest remains baked into Kenya’s governance model.

References:

KMPDU Promise Made, Promise Kept As Doctors Receive Full 2017–2024 CBA Arrears

BMJ Global Health Tackling health professionals’ strikes: an essential part of health system strengthening in Kenya

Health Business Ministry of Health signs agreement with KMPDU in new deal

Finn Partners The Evolution of Healthcare in Kenya Amidst Doctor’s Strike and the Rise of Digital Health Innovations