The impeachment of Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza has been marked by persistent attempts by the Meru County Assembly Members (MCAs) to remove her from office. Accusations of nepotism, illegal appointments, and violation of the constitution led to the first impeachment in December 2022, followed by a second attempt within ten months. Tensions between the governor and the MCAs, fueled by her autocratic leadership style, resulted in repeated impeachment attempts within less than two years. Despite surviving two Senate hearings, a third impeachment attempt has occurred in August 2024, indicating ongoing tensions.

The County Assembly’s persistent pursuit of impeachment against Governor Mwangaza, despite multiple acquittals by the Senate, reveals their strong opposition based on a perceived marginalization of their role in county governance. They argue that the Governor’s unilateral decision-making has undermined the constitutional principles of checks and balances, leading to conflicts over the Assembly’s oversight role. The Senate’s interventions resulting in Mwangaza’s acquittal have underscored the complexity of Kenya’s devolution framework and the high threshold for removing a county governor. However, this has not resolved the underlying tension, raising concerns about the misuse of impeachment for political vendettas. Efforts to mediate and resolve the dispute through traditional and legal channels, including the involvement of the Njuri Ncheke, have been hindered by internal divisions within the council, reflecting the broader political rift in Meru. This indicates potential inadequacies in addressing political disputes within devolved governments.

The ongoing conflict has exposed the limitations of the current legal framework, which may lack the necessary provisions to effectively mediate such political disputes within county governments. To address this protracted conflict, a more comprehensive approach is needed, involving both legal reforms and enhanced mediation efforts. Strengthening the constitutional guidelines for impeachment, ensuring they are not susceptible to political manipulation, is crucial. Additionally, fostering dialogue between the governor and the MCAs through neutral mediators or national government representatives could help bridge the divide. Legislative amendments might also be necessary to empower county assemblies with oversight while safeguarding the executive’s authority, thus restoring stability and promoting effective governance in Meru.

References:

Nation Njuri Ncheke split over Kawira Mwangaza ouster

The Star Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza impeached again

The Standard Kawira Mwangaza impeached for third time

Nation Circus in Meru: MCAs table fifth ouster motion against governor Kawira Mwangaza

The Star Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza survives impeachment

Capital News Governor Kawira Mwangaza survives second impeachment as Senate acquits her

The Star Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza impeached

Nation Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza impeached for the second time in 10 months

Nation Events that led to Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza’s impeachment 

Capital News Senate Committee to start Governor Mwangaza’s impeachment hearing Tuesday

People Daily Meru MCAs impeach Governor Kawira Mwangaza once again