Health Sector Flashpoints — When Counties Betray Care

Kenya’s public health system is once again on the operating table — but this time, the diagnosis points beyond fiscal failure to institutional betrayal. The government’s May 2024 payout of KSh 3.5 billion in doctors’ arrears briefly restored faith in the state’s willingness to honor past commitments under the 2017–2024 CBA. Yet, beneath the celebration, cracks widened. Barely weeks later, the same administration plunged the sector into chaos over the medical interns’ stipend standoff, slashing agreed pay from KSh 206,400 to 70,000 under the guise of “limited fiscal space.” The ensuing paralysis—interns idled, courts flooded with petitions, hospitals short-staffed—signaled not financial constraint but a governance culture that governs by deferral, treating legality and professionalism as expendable luxuries. What should have been a steady reform agenda has degenerated into episodic crisis management, where every partial solution simply queues up the next emergency.

The deterioration has now metastasized to the counties, where devolved power has mutated into deflection and denial. In Kiambu County, doctors have been on strike for months, accusing the governor of presiding over a “battle of egos” instead of a rescue plan. (The Standard) The Kenya Medical Practitioners, Pharmacists and Dentists Union (KMPDU) has condemned county governments for “derailing progress” by ignoring CBAs, delaying salaries, and politicizing healthcare delivery. The union’s outrage spiked after reports that 131 newborns died amid the Kiambu crisis, a tragedy the Council of Governors publicly dismissed as “false publication.” (Citizen Digital) The KMPDU now demands accountability, an apology, and an independent investigation—warning of a nationwide strike on October 25 if county impunity persists. What began as a county dispute has evolved into a national indictment of how devolution, once hailed as reform, has devolved into an administrative minefield where human life becomes collateral to political vanity.

This crisis extends far beyond Kiambu — it is metastasizing across the entire devolved health network, revealing a structural rot that no press release can conceal. Health workers in Nairobi, Isiolo, Marsabit, and other counties are already on edge over delayed salaries, missing allowances, and ignored CBAs, while local leaders deflect responsibility with ritual blame games. Each county now operates like a fiefdom, where governors weaponize fiscal autonomy to evade national accountability. The result is a patchwork of suffering: hospitals running without drugs, maternity wards closing for lack of staff, and patients dying quietly as politicians trade televised barbs. In this grotesque inversion of priorities, doctors and nurses must fight court battles simply to be paid, while the state spends millions staging health summits and PR drives about universal care. The moral decay runs deeper than bureaucratic failure — it is ethical bankruptcy. Devolution was meant to bring services closer to the people; instead, it has brought corruption closer to the patient. The Council of Governors, once the face of localized empowerment, now functions as a shield for negligence, dismissing human tragedies as “falsehoods” even when families bury their dead. A government that forces doctors back to work through court orders, instead of dialogue, has abdicated the very essence of governance. Every delayed salary and every stillborn infant is a symptom of a political elite desensitized to suffering — one that governs not through service, but through spectacle. Unless the state reclaims discipline, compassion, and coherence in health governance, Kenya’s pursuit of universal healthcare will remain a hollow slogan floating over a silent emergency ward.

References:

The Standard Battle of egos: Counties accused of derailing progress in health sector

Citizen Digital KMPDU slams Governors over Kiambu health crisis, issues demands amid looming national strike

The Standard Doctors to join their striking Kiambu colleagues starting Wednesday

Finn Partners The Evolution of Healthcare in Kenya Amidst Doctor’s Strike and the Rise of Digital Health Innovations

TV47 Kenya Trust deficit is Kenya Kwanza’s greatest undoing” – MP Makali Mulu

Frequent Cabinet Reshuffles in Developing Democracies: Kenya Under Scrutiny

Cabinet reshuffles, a common feature in many developing democracies, often reflect a complex interplay between the need for governmental competence and the pressures of political maneuvering, as evidenced by the recent changes in the Kenyan administration. Defined as alterations in the executive branch’s composition, these reshuffles can be driven by various factors, including the desire to enhance government performance, address corruption, consolidate political power, reward loyalty, respond to public pressure, or signal policy shifts. The Kenyan cabinet reshuffle of March 2025, which saw key figures like Aden Duale moved to the Ministry of Health and Justin Muturi dismissed from his role in Public Service, exemplifies this dynamic. While the stated reasons often revolve around improving service delivery and aligning with the government’s agenda, underlying motivations frequently involve political considerations such as managing internal dissent, rewarding allies, and strategically positioning individuals within the executive. This constant reshuffling raises fundamental questions about the balance between appointing technically skilled individuals and ensuring political loyalty in the pursuit of effective governance.  

A Report by Citizen Digital

The motivations behind frequent cabinet reshuffles in developing democracies are multifaceted, often stemming from a blend of administrative and political imperatives. In the Kenyan context, the reassignment of Aden Duale to the Health Ministry to address challenges within the Social Health Authority suggests an attempt to improve government performance in a critical sector. However, the dismissal of Justin Muturi, following his public criticism of the government and subsequent accusations of incompetence from President Ruto, highlights the significance of political loyalty and the management of dissenting voices within the cabinet. Academic literature supports this observation, noting that leaders in developing democracies often prioritize consolidating political power and rewarding loyalty, sometimes at the expense of technical competence. This “loyalty-competence trade-off” is a recurring dilemma where leaders balance the need for effective governance with the imperative of maintaining political stability and control. The Kenyan reshuffle, with its mix of stated performance objectives and apparent political motivations, underscores this complex dynamic.

The frequent occurrence of cabinet reshuffles can have significant consequences for governance and public perception in developing democracies like Kenya. While intended to inject new impetus or address specific challenges, these changes can also lead to instability within government ministries, disrupting policy continuity and hindering the development of long-term strategic planning. When ministers are frequently moved or replaced, the time required for new appointees to gain expertise and build effective working relationships can impede the overall effectiveness of governance. Furthermore, if the public perceives these reshuffles as being driven primarily by political expediency rather than a genuine commitment to improved governance, it can erode public trust in government institutions and the democratic process. The Kenyan example, with its swift dismissal of a cabinet secretary after public disagreement, risks reinforcing perceptions of a system where loyalty trumps competence, potentially impacting public confidence and the long-term stability of the nation’s governance.

References:

The Star Duale moved to Health ministry in new Cabinet changes

KBC President Ruto drops Muturi in new cabinet changes

National Research University – Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia The loyalty-competence tradeoff in dictatorships and outside options for subordinates.

The Constitution Society The Complex Implications of Reshuffles




High Court Strikes Down Government Media Directive

In a significant blow to the government’s media policy, the High Court has resoundingly declared as unconstitutional a directive that sought to channel all public sector advertising exclusively through the state-owned Kenya Broadcasting Corporation (KBC). This landmark ruling, delivered by Justice Lawrence Mugambi, effectively nullifies the order issued by the ICT Principal Secretary, Edward Kisiang’ani, in March 2024, which mandated that all government ministries, agencies, and parastatals place their advertising solely with the national broadcaster. The court’s decisive action underscores the judiciary’s commitment to upholding the tenets of the Kenyan Constitution, particularly those safeguarding media freedom, equality, and the principles of good governance, thereby setting a crucial precedent for the relationship between the state and the media landscape.  

A Report by KTN News Kenya

The High Court’s judgment hinged on the finding that the directive contravened several fundamental articles of the Constitution. Justice Mugambi meticulously detailed how the policy violated Article 10, which enshrines good governance and integrity, Article 27, which guarantees equality and freedom from discrimination, and Article 34, which protects the freedom of the media. The court reasoned that limiting government advertising to a single entity constituted an indirect form of control over the media, potentially stifling dissenting voices and undermining the independence of the press. Furthermore, the judge pointed out a critical procedural flaw, asserting that the ICT Principal Secretary had overstepped his legal authority, as the power to make such a significant policy decision regarding public procurement of advertising services rests solely with the Treasury Cabinet Secretary. This lack of legal mandate rendered the directive void from its inception, highlighting the importance of adherence to established legal frameworks in government operations.

The implications of this ruling extend far beyond a mere legal victory; it serves as a powerful reaffirmation of the critical role of a diverse and independent media in a democratic society. Had the directive been allowed to stand, it would have created an uneven playing field, unfairly disadvantaging private media houses that rely heavily on government advertising revenue for their sustainability. Critics had argued that such a policy would not only threaten the financial viability of independent media outlets, potentially leading to job losses and closures, but also limit the public’s access to a plurality of voices and perspectives. The court’s decision safeguards against the potential for government influence through financial leverage, ensuring that the media can continue to operate as a watchdog, holding power to account and providing the public with the information necessary for informed participation in national discourse.

References:

Citizen Digital High Court declares gov’t advertising monopoly unconstitutional

Nation ‘Non-existent powers’: Court quashes PS Kisiang’ani order restricting State advertising to KBC

Kenyans.co.ke High Court Rules That Kisiang’ani Directive Moving Govt Advertising to KBC is Unconstitutional

The Eastleigh Voice High Court declares ICT PS Kisiang’ani has no powers to decide who gets govt advertising

The Standard State cancels adverts to Standard Media as court set to rule on ad monopoly case



Impact of Kenya’s Court Decision on University Funding

Kenya’s ambitious new university funding model, intended to revolutionize higher education financing, remains in a state of uncertainty following a decisive blow from the High Court, which declared it unconstitutional in December 2024. Justice Chacha Mwita cited a lack of legal framework, discriminatory elements based on financial ability, school type, age, and ambiguous criteria like “household income,” and insufficient public participation as key reasons for the ruling, a decision hailed as a victory by students and civil society groups who had long protested the model’s perceived unfairness. The National Student Caucus celebrated the ruling as an opportunity for national reflection on tertiary education funding, echoing the sentiments of thousands of students who had earlier taken to the streets in September 2024, decrying the increased financial burden placed on them and their families, with over 10,000 students even appealing their assigned funding allocations. Parents, too, voiced relief, having expressed fears that the new model would lock out deserving students due to unaffordable costs and flawed categorization through the Means Testing Instrument (MTI). The Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC), a key petitioner in the case alongside the Elimu Bora Working Group and a Students’ Caucus, framed the model as a manifestation of “neoliberal” policies that commodify education, emphasizing the need for a funding approach that prioritizes accessibility and equity for all Kenyans, as education is considered a fundamental public good.  

A Report by Citizen Digital

Despite the High Court’s firm stance, the government has swiftly appealed the decision, with Education Cabinet Secretary (CS) Julius Ogamba reaffirming the commitment to the model’s core principles of ensuring no needy student is left behind and highlighting that the government had doubled funding to universities in the past two years. While acknowledging the initial challenges and inaccuracies in the Means Testing Instrument (MTI), the government is actively working on revisions, with a special committee appointed by President William Ruto submitting a preliminary report proposing changes and aiming for a re-introduction by September to coincide with the admission of new first-year students. However, this legal tug-of-war has created a significant impasse, leaving universities in a precarious financial situation. Professor Daniel Mugendi, chair of the Public Universities Vice Chancellors’ Committee, warned of an impending crisis if the matter is not resolved promptly, highlighting the difficulties in running institutions with delayed fund disbursements, especially for first and second-year students who cannot access government support as the allocated funds are held by the Higher Education Loans Board (HELB) and the Universities Fund (UF) awaiting court direction. The Universities Fund (UF) Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Geoffrey Monari, also voiced concerns that the suspension could exacerbate the already mounting public debt for universities, emphasizing the intended benefits of the new model in alleviating financial strain and granting universities independence to commercialize research. Currently, universities are navigating the uncertainty by agreeing not to demand fees from first and second-year students until the issue is resolved through the courts, while relying on the older Differentiated Unit Cost (DUC) model for continuing students.  

As the legal battle continues, stakeholders are actively proposing alternative solutions and voicing their concerns about the long-term implications. Private universities, through the National Association of Private Universities in Kenya (NAPUK), have seized this moment to advocate for a fundamental shift towards a loan-based funding model, suggesting the establishment of a unified National Students Financial Aid Corporation (NSFAC) to streamline financial assistance across both public and private institutions and move away from a “social-welfare orientation.” This proposal reflects a broader debate about the sustainability and equity of higher education financing in Kenya, especially considering historical funding disparities where private universities received significantly less government support under the DUC model. The ongoing uncertainty has left many first and second-year students in limbo, unsure of the fees they will ultimately be required to pay, with some even facing difficulties in enrolling or sitting for exams due to the funding crisis, as universities demand outstanding fees based on the now-unconstitutional band system. Furthermore, an audit report revealed significant operational challenges and management flaws in the initial implementation of the new funding model, including a lack of coordination between key agencies like the UF, HELB, and the Kenya Universities and Colleges Central Placement Service (KUCCPS), raising concerns about the efficiency and fairness of fund allocation and the long-term sustainability of the fund given low loan repayment rates. The path forward remains unclear, but the need for a resolution that addresses both the financial sustainability of universities and the accessibility of higher education for all qualified Kenyan students is more pressing than ever.  

References:

People’s Dispatch Kenya’s High Court delivers blow to neoliberal university funding model

Business Daily Hundreds of students locked out of varsities as finance woes persist

KBC Private Universities offer middle ground proposals on funding model

Nation Ogamba: Improved draft for new varsity funding model ready

Capital News High Court declines to lift orders quashing new University Funding Model

Nation Hundreds fail to report to universities over funding crisis

Kenya’s Healthcare Financing: SHA Performance Review

Six months after its nationwide launch in October 2024, Kenya’s ambitious transition from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) to the Social Health Authority (SHA) and its financing arm, the Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF), is facing significant challenges, casting a shadow over the nation’s pursuit of Universal Health Coverage (UHC). An early assessment reveals a concerning decline in the implementation’s performance score, dropping from 46 percent in December to a meager 44 percent by February 2025, earning a “poor grade of D” . This regression, highlighted by the Rural and Urban Private Hospitals Association of Kenya (Rupha), points to a deterioration in crucial service delivery areas, notably the financial health of healthcare providers, the functionality of the new system, and the efficiency of outpatient reimbursements . While some progress has been noted in areas like e-contracting and patient verification, these minor advancements are struggling to offset the growing difficulties in critical domains such as claims management and ensuring the financial stability of hospitals and clinics across the country .

A Report by Citizen Digital

A major stumbling block in the initial phase of SHA/SHIF has been the glaring financial instability plaguing healthcare providers due to inconsistent and delayed payments . Alarmingly, nearly half of all healthcare facilities reported receiving irregular payments as of February 2025, with the situation particularly dire for smaller, level two and three hospitals, where a staggering 64 percent reported receiving no payments at all . This precarious financial situation is compounded by a substantial inherited debt of Sh30.9 billion from the NHIF, further straining the already limited resources of the SHA . The significant funding gap between the projected Ksh168 billion needed for full implementation and the mere Ksh6.1 billion allocated to the SHA in the current budget raises serious questions about the long-term sustainability of the scheme . Operational inefficiencies are also hindering progress, with increasing difficulties reported in claims management and the effectiveness of new reimbursement models . Moreover, ongoing system updates and persistent challenges in navigating the SHA portal are impacting service delivery, while public hospitals are grappling with long waiting times and service delays .

Public perception and adoption of the new healthcare system also present considerable hurdles. Despite the mandatory nature of the scheme, registration and active contribution rates remain worryingly low, with only 3.3 million Kenyans actively contributing out of the 19.4 million registered . This is further underscored by the fact that initial voluntary registration fell far short of the government’s target . Public resistance has been fueled by concerns over the new contribution model, which sees salaried workers contributing a higher percentage of their income compared to the previous flat rate under NHIF . This has led to calls for a fairer system, particularly for low-income households . Furthermore, reports indicate a concerning rise in out-of-pocket expenses for patients, particularly in private and faith-based facilities, contradicting the very aim of UHC to reduce the financial burden of healthcare . Coupled with reports of limited coverage and lower reimbursement rates for specialized treatments compared to the NHIF, the initial performance of SHA/SHIF suggests that significant challenges must be urgently addressed to ensure its effectiveness in providing equitable and quality healthcare for all Kenyans .

References:

Nation Explainer: How to make Kenya’s NHIF-SHIF transition less painful

Nation Healthcare reforms suffer setback as SHA performance declines

Nation Bold commitment to Kenya’s healthcare equity and growth

Transforming Kenya’s Tax System: Path to Sustainable Economic Growth

Kenya’s economic trajectory has recently demonstrated remarkable resilience, particularly through the strengthening of the Kenyan shilling, a development largely attributed to the country’s evolving fiscal policies. The government’s strategic economic management, guided by a mix of tax reforms and regional trade initiatives, has played a crucial role in stabilizing the currency and bolstering investor confidence. A centerpiece of this approach is the National Tax Policy, designed to create a stable and predictable tax environment. By addressing inefficiencies within the tax system, policymakers aim to widen the tax base and attract more foreign investment, fostering a climate of economic predictability and long-term growth. These reforms align with the broader objectives of the Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda (BETA), which seeks to lower the cost of living, generate employment, and enhance social security, positioning Kenya on a path toward sustainable economic development.

A Citizen Digital Report

Kenya’s tax system has undergone significant transformation since independence, evolving from a narrow and regressive structure into a more sophisticated framework incorporating income tax, excise duties, and customs levies. The landmark 1973 Income Tax Act has continuously been revised to match international best practices, ensuring that the country remains competitive in a globalized economic environment. More recently, the government introduced a Medium-Term Revenue Strategy aimed at broadening the tax base and ensuring fair taxation across various economic sectors. These administrative and policy-driven reforms are expected to enhance revenue collection, reducing reliance on external borrowing and strengthening national financial stability. Such fiscal discipline is essential not only for economic resilience but also for sustaining long-term development goals, as outlined in Kenya Vision 2030’s Fourth Medium-Term Plan (2023-2027).

Beyond domestic fiscal policies, Kenya has increasingly leveraged regional economic integration to bolster its financial standing. As a key player in the East African Community (EAC), Kenya has prioritized strengthening trade and investment ties within the region, reinforcing its role as an economic powerhouse. These regional partnerships have not only expanded market access for Kenyan businesses but also contributed to currency stability, as cross-border trade boosts foreign exchange reserves. By balancing domestic fiscal discipline with a proactive regional economic strategy, Kenya continues to enhance its economic resilience, demonstrating the potential of well-executed policy frameworks in navigating global financial uncertainties.

References:

MTP-IV-2023-2027

NATIONAL TAX POLICY

Center for Strategic & International Studies Kenya’s Economic Initiatives in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Revitalizing Kenya’s Mining Industry: A Path to Prosperity

Kenya, a nation famed for its wildlife and tourism, harbors vast untapped mineral wealth that could significantly boost its economy. Despite the presence of valuable resources such as gold, titanium, soda ash, limestone, and various gemstones, the mining sector remains a dormant asset, contributing less than 1% to the national GDP. The failure to capitalize on these resources stems from challenges such as inadequate exploration, limited power supply, insufficient refining infrastructure, and rampant illegal mining, which not only deprives the government of revenue but also raises environmental and security concerns. However, Kenya’s strategic location along the Indian Ocean and its well-developed port infrastructure present a lucrative opportunity to establish itself as a key regional hub for mineral exports, benefiting both the local economy and landlocked neighbors seeking access to global markets.

Citizen Digital Report

Recognizing the urgency of revitalizing the sector, the government has initiated a series of legislative and policy reforms to attract investment and streamline operations. Vision 2030 identifies mining as a crucial driver of economic growth, while the Mining Act of 2016 modernized regulatory frameworks to promote responsible extraction and trade. Recent government actions, including the Mining (Amendment) Bill and the lifting of a moratorium on new exploration licenses in October 2023, signal a renewed focus on investment-friendly policies. The formalization of artisanal and small-scale mining has also gained traction as a means to improve sectoral contributions while ensuring worker safety and sustainability. Despite these efforts, critical obstacles persist, including inefficient regulatory processes, poor infrastructure, an unreliable power supply, and safety hazards that have led to frequent mine collapses, particularly in small-scale operations.

To fully unlock the sector’s potential, Kenya must prioritize investments in geological exploration, renewable energy sources, and local refining capacity to maximize value addition. Infrastructure improvements, including better roads, railways, and ports, will reduce logistical costs and enhance efficiency. Expediting licensing processes and enforcing stricter safety and environmental regulations will foster a more stable and investor-friendly industry. Addressing illegal mining through law enforcement and supporting sustainable practices will not only boost revenue but also safeguard ecosystems from degradation. With strategic interventions and robust policy implementation, Kenya can transform its mining industry into a thriving pillar of economic growth, solidifying its position as a regional leader in mineral trade while fostering sustainable development for future generations.

References:

Kenya News Agency Inside CS Joho’s grand vision of transforming mining sector into Kenya’s economic pillar

INTELLINEWS Kenya’s untapped mineral wealth holds the promise of economic transformation

Bowmans Kenya: Mining outlook 2023 – Current status and future possibilities

Institute for Security Studies Gold and governance provide hope for Kenya’s artisanal miners

EAC Natural Resources

Muhoro & Gitonga Associates Mining in Kenya: Current Status & Future Possibilities

Business Daily Catastrophic mine failures risk small-scale mining sector

Pact The economic contributions of artisanal and small-scale mining in Kenya: Gold and gemstones

Will CHAN 2024 Transform Kenyan Football?

Kenya finds itself at a critical juncture as it prepares to co-host the 2024 African Nations Championship (CHAN) alongside Tanzania and Uganda. This opportunity comes with the potential to transform Kenya’s position on the continental football stage. Reflecting on past setbacks in hosting the 1996 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) and losing the 2018 CHAN rights, the nation faces a formidable test in delivering on its promise this time around. As Sports Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen urges, national patriotism and unity are crucial, emphasizing that the current debate and pressure can serve as catalysts for achieving the desired success. By learning from its historical challenges and engaging in robust infrastructural and logistical preparations, Kenya is determined to demonstrate its capacity to host international tournaments effectively.

KBC Report

Scheduled for February 1 to February 28, 2025, CHAN 2024 is not just a football tournament but an acid test of Kenya’s preparedness and organizational prowess. As CAF inspectors monitor the progress, with deadlines looming large, the stakes could not be higher. Stadium renovations at Nyayo and Kasarani are under intense scrutiny, and Murkomen acknowledges the enormity of the task ahead, admitting the oversight in offering two stadiums. Nevertheless, the establishment of the CHAN 2024 and AFCON 2027 Local Organizing Committee, under Nicholas Musonye’s leadership, represents a strategic response to these challenges. Meanwhile, newly elected Football Kenya Federation President Hussein Mohammed’s appeal to the private sector for active involvement further underscores the collaborative effort required to elevate Kenya’s football infrastructure and capabilities.

As Kenya steps into the spotlight, CHAN 2024 emerges as a defining test that could ultimately reshape Kenya’s sporting narrative and bolster East Africa’s football reputation. The nation stands to gain not only from the economic and social benefits of hosting but also from placing itself firmly on the map as a regional sports hub. However, the potential repercussions of losing hosting rights remain a stark reminder of the stakes involved. What role should national pride and private investment play in meeting these challenges? How can Kenya leverage this opportunity for a sustainable legacy? We invite you to share your thoughts and insights as we navigate this turning point in Kenyan and East African football history. Join the conversation and help shape the future of regional sports development.

References:

CECAFA African Nations Championship 2025 dates announced

BBC Kenya confident it will remain as CHAN 2024 co-host

TV47 Digital Murkomen dismisses claims of Kenya losing CHAN and AFCON hosting rights

Nation 2027 Afcon and 2024 CHAN: Kenya appoints team to oversee preparations

The Standard Murkomen confident Kenya will host CHAN 2024

BBC Kenya stripped of hosting rights for CHAN 2018

Nation Why Kenya lost rights to host 16-nation Africa soccer contest

Nation Kenya loses Chan hosting rights as Caf decides – VIDEO

Nation Kenya’s failure to host 1996 Afcon a blot in Moi’s rich sporting legacy

KIPPRA Hosting the African Cup of Nations: What Kenya Needs to Know



Importance of Stakeholder Engagement in Kenya’s CBC Rollout

As the countdown to January 6, 2025, continues, the challenges of transitioning Grade 9 learners under Kenya’s Competency-Based Curriculum (CBC) remain pressing but not insurmountable. Choosing this moment to abandon the CBC would only deepen the disruption experienced throughout the education sector. Instead, it is crucial to address the systemic gaps that currently hinder the curriculum’s success. Paramount to these efforts is the need for timely and transparent disbursement of the KSh 15.3 billion allocated for infrastructure and resources. Schools must complete critical projects to accommodate the new cohort of learners adequately. Simultaneously, a renewed focus on teacher training is vital; educators must be equipped with the skills necessary to deliver the CBC effectively. Without this commitment to human capital development, the curriculum risks becoming little more than policy rhetoric.

KTN Report

Parents and communities play a pivotal role in this transition, serving as essential stakeholders in the education process. It is crucial for parents to actively engage with schools and view educational reforms as a shared responsibility. As the saying goes, “if you think education is expensive, try ignorance,” underscoring the importance of investing in future generations. Therefore, parents must participate actively, even amidst holiday distractions, by supporting their children’s learning journey. Local leaders and non-governmental organizations can support these efforts by leveraging resources and providing technical expertise where needed, especially in marginalized areas. A community-driven approach is key to ensuring a sustainable and inclusive rollout that benefits all learners.

On a broader scale, Kenya must critically evaluate its approach to educational reform. Drawing insights from successful models, like Finland’s competency-based education, can offer valuable guidance. However, these insights must be adapted meaningfully to reflect Kenya’s socio-economic realities. Developing tailored solutions requires engaging educators, parents, and learners in the reform process, creating a curriculum that resonates with the nation’s specific needs. As Kenya progresses, the necessary shift from short-term fixes to a comprehensive and holistic educational strategy, encompassing infrastructure, teacher training, and curriculum development, will be vital. Addressing these foundational issues will allow the CBC to transform into a tool for equitable and effective education. The upcoming January transition presents a crucial opportunity for Kenya to reaffirm its commitment to educational excellence and establish a solid foundation for its learners’ futures.

References:

Nation Grade 9: Staring at a crisis

Kenyans.co.ke Education Ministry Ready for Grade 9 Transition

Nation Move swiftly to avert looming Grade 9 crisis

The Standard 50 days to Grade 9 rollout: Are schools ready for CBC transition?

The Kenya Times Govt Addresses Looming Crisis in Schools Ahead of Reopening

The Star Ruto: We’re ready for Grade 9 transition in 2025

Nation Ruto says government is ready for Grade 9, but reality on the ground is different

Nation Why Grade 9 roll-out could be chaotic for schools

Kenya News Agency Kenya-Finland strategizes on CBC implementation

The Star Finland partners with Kenya to enhance CBC

Challenges and Gains of Kenya’s Unified PayBill System

In 2021, President William Ruto mandated that all Kenyan government agencies onboard their payment systems onto the eCitizen platform using a unified PayBill number. This move aimed to enhance transparency, reduce corruption, and centralize revenue collection. The directive leveraged Kenya’s already significant digital infrastructure, including the widespread use of mobile money, to improve public service delivery. The eCitizen platform, launched in 2014, integrates over 270 services into a digital framework that eliminates inefficiencies like pilferage and bureaucratic delays. The transition has delivered measurable gains, with non-tax revenue increasing by KES 8.6 billion in a year and monthly collections crossing KES 2 billion. Users have benefited from the convenience of making payments remotely, and government agencies have experienced fewer operational inefficiencies. However, some agencies have resisted compliance, preferring independent systems, and systemic challenges during periods of high demand have occasionally hindered user satisfaction.

KBC Report

Despite its promise, the directive has drawn criticism, primarily for its neglect of Kenya’s digital divide. Rural and economically disadvantaged communities often lack the infrastructure, smartphones, or digital literacy required to access eCitizen services, leaving many excluded from essential government functions. Instances of systemic failure, where users were unable to complete critical transactions, have heightened public frustration and raised questions about the platform’s reliability. Additionally, centralizing payments has exposed bottlenecks, particularly during periods of peak activity such as school fee payments. Critics argue that these issues could have been mitigated with better infrastructure, comprehensive user training programs, and broader stakeholder engagement during implementation. Resistance from certain government agencies further complicates the directive’s full realization, as they remain reluctant to cede control of previously independent revenue streams.

President Ruto’s directive is emblematic of Kenya’s ambition to lead in digital governance, showcasing the potential of mobile money and centralized systems in modernizing public service delivery. The integration of mobile payments has bolstered compliance and convenience, demonstrating that digital solutions can drive economic efficiency and transparency. However, the government must address systemic challenges to ensure inclusivity, robustness, and trust in the platform. By investing in infrastructure, reducing the digital literacy gap, and fostering collaborative implementation with all stakeholders, the eCitizen platform could evolve into a model of equitable and efficient governance. Without these measures, the risk remains that the digital transformation will exacerbate inequalities rather than mitigate them, leaving Kenya’s most vulnerable populations behind.

References:

MSN William Ruto orders KPLC, other state agencies to shift to single eCitizen pay bill

Business Daily State eyes more income with Sh689m e-Citizen allocation

The Star State directs national school parents to pay fees via e-citizen

Nation Ruto’s directive on single pay point for all govt services challenged

Business Daily Single paybill lifts non-tax collection by Sh8.6bn

Business Daily Monthly e-Citizen revenue crosses Sh2bn mark under single paybill

Business Daily State collects Sh127bn via e-Citizen

The Standard State services to be paid via single paybill

Nation Broken system: The e-Citizen nightmare

An Assessment of the Impact of Mobile Payments on theAdoption of e-Government Services in Kenya: A Case Study of eCitizen. Author: Nicolas Wasunna