Oil and Water: Can Global Finance Fix Local Corruption?

The “Food-for-Eurobond” deal relies on a dangerous assumption: that savings from international debt relief can navigate the treacherous waters of Kenya’s local bureaucracy without being looted. History suggests this is an “oil and water” scenario—liquid finance attempting to mix with a rigid, opaque system. The recent scandals at the Kenya National Trading Corporation (KNTC) and the National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB) serve as grim warnings. In the KNTC edible oils scandal, tax waivers meant to lower prices were captured by politically connected firms, resulting in a Sh16.5 billion loss with no benefit to the consumer.

Similarly, the NCPB’s recent distribution of “fake fertilizer”—bags filled with quarry dust—demonstrates how easily “agricultural support” can be weaponized against the farmers it is meant to help. If the swap funds are channeled through these same “bureaucratic consignments,” the initiative risks becoming another slush fund for cartels. The involvement of the World Food Programme (WFP) is intended to act as an “emulsifier,” forcing accountability into the system, but their oversight powers will be tested against deeply entrenched patronage networks.

Experts warn that without a radical overhaul of state agencies, the “savings” will evaporate before they buy a single bag of genuine fertilizer or build a working silo. The structural disconnect between the Treasury’s high-level deal-making and the Ministry of Agriculture’s operational failures remains the single biggest risk. Unless the government bypasses these compromised intermediaries, perhaps by funding private sector credit guarantees instead of direct procurement, the “oil” of finance will float to the top, leaving the “water” of development murky and stagnant.

References:

Milling Middle East & Africa Kenya’s edible oil scandal raises questions over accountability, transparency

AP Farmers in Africa say their soil is dying and chemical fertilizers are in part to blame

Has Kenya Become a Cocaine Trafficking Hub?

It was reported on NTV that “In 2004 Kenyan Police netted a consignment of cocaine worth 6.4 billion Kenyan shillings. Seven years down the line, no one has been held responsible”. On March 25, 2011, 98 packets of cocaine weighing 2 kgs each with a street value of Ksh 500 million were netted in Shanzu area in Mombasa. The 6 suspects, 3 Kenyans, 2 Iranians, and 1 Pakistani national were charged the same day for alleged drug trafficking. The unsolved mystery, however, is how the consignment originally weighing 196 kg came to weight only 102 kg 3 days later when the suspects reappeared in court. Where did the 94 kg of heroin go?

In addition, according to the prosecution, the suspects illegally possessed 30 rounds of ammunition and two firearms. It now turns out that two of the suspects, Yusuf Hassan and Hassan Ibrahim, have valid firearm certificates issued by the state. Does this mean that the charges are likely to be dropped letting the alleged drug traffickers get away with it?

Has Kenya become a cocaine trafficking hub? The question that lingers in Kenyans’ minds today is why the justice system is turning a blind eye on the corruption within. We need answers because we’re intelligent enough to discern 196 kg from 102 kg. We can’t just sigh and let it be when 94 kg of cocaine deemed as evidence disappears in a court of law. It is time for the Kenya Anti Corruption Commission to be true to its people and spare its country unwarranted shame. Otherwise, Kenya will just be another safe haven for drug barons.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irSaIZWh3nw

References:

Contradictions over weight of seized drugs 29/03/2011

Six to be charged with trafficking 196kg drugs 27/03/2011

Police must unravel missing drugs puzzle 29/03/2011