Category Archives: Agriculture

Harvesting the ROI—The Macroeconomic Impact of the Subsidy

Posted on by

The economic ripple effects of the 2025 fertilizer subsidy program are beginning to manifest in Kenya’s national food security metrics with startling clarity. According to the June 2025 Treasury budget highlights, the government has allocated Ksh 8 billion specifically for the Fertilizer Subsidy Programme for the 2025/2026 financial year. This is part of a broader Ksh 47.6 billion agricultural transformation budget aimed at moving Kenya from a “food deficit” nation to a “food surplus” economy. By slashing the cost of a 50kg bag by approximately 60% compared to market rates, the program has successfully triggered a 38.9% increase in maize production in high-potential regions, directly contributing to the stabilization of mealie-meal prices in urban centers like Nakuru and Nairobi.

Kenya is set to harvest 70 million bags of maize in 2025 | NTV Kenya

However, the 2025 policy is no longer just about quantity; it is increasingly about soil health and long-term sustainability. New directives from the Ministry of Agriculture emphasize the use of NPK 23:23:0 and other non-acidic blends to correct soil degradation caused by years of over-relying on DAP. This scientific approach ensures that the “bumper harvests” seen this year are not a one-time fluke but the beginning of a sustained increase in yield per hectare. For the Kenyan farmer, this shift represents a move toward “Precision Agriculture,” where the digital data collected during KIAMIS registration helps the government determine which specific nutrient blends are needed for which regions, potentially saving billions in wasted inputs.

The final piece of this economic puzzle lies in the integration of “De-Risking” strategies. For the first time, the 2025 digital registration automatically links farmers to climate-risk insurance and credit facilities. This means that a farmer who buys subsidized fertilizer is also protected against the devastating losses of drought or floods, making the entire agricultural sector more attractive to young “agri-preneurs.” As Jijuze continues to monitor these developments, it is clear that the fertilizer subsidy is the anchor of a much larger economic engine. By empowering smallholders with affordable inputs and digital tools, Kenya is slowly rebuilding its agricultural backbone, turning the “kabambe” phone into a powerful tool for national prosperity.

References:

Capital Business Maize harvest to hit 70mn bags in 2025, up from 67mn last year

The Kenyan Wall Street The Hidden Costs of Kenya’s Fertiliser Subsidy Model

Jijuze How to Access Subsidized Fertilizer in Kenya


The “Iron Circuit”—Solving the Last Mile Bottleneck

Posted on by

The logistical machinery behind the 2025 fertilizer subsidy has undergone a radical shift to solve the “depot bottleneck” that plagued previous seasons. In late March 2025, the Ministry of Agriculture, led by CS Mutahi Kagwe, confirmed a massive surge in distribution, moving over one million bags of fertilizer in a single week to meet the high demand of the long rain season. The strategic change this year involves a heavy reliance on the “Iron Circuit”—using the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) freight wagons to bypass the congested Port of Mombasa and deliver directly to the Naivasha Inland Container Depot. This shift has significantly reduced the turnaround time for stocks, ensuring that once a farmer receives their e-voucher via the KIAMIS system, the physical bags are already staged at regional hubs rather than being stuck in highway transit.

The iron circuit

Despite these macro-logistical wins, the “Last Mile” remains the most significant challenge for the average Kenyan smallholder. Current research indicates that while private agro-dealers are usually within 6km of a farm, centralized NCPB depots are often an average of 18km away. To bridge this gap in 2025, the government has entered into critical Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) with county governments like Uasin Gishu and Nakuru. These partnerships allow for the transfer of fertilizer from main regional hubs to smaller, county-run satellite depots. This decentralization strategy is designed to lower the “hidden costs” of the subsidy—specifically the high transport fees farmers previously paid to move 50kg bags across long distances, which often eroded the savings provided by the government-capped price of Ksh 2,500.

At the depot level, the 2025 experience is becoming increasingly automated, yet it requires farmer vigilance. The Ministry has introduced “Consignment-Based Framework Agreements,” allowing for a more diverse mix of fertilizers, including crop-specific blends for coffee and tea sectors, moving away from a “one-size-fits-all” approach. However, with high demand comes the risk of exploitation. Farmers are urged to verify their e-vouchers through the upgraded KIAMIS interface before making the journey to the depot to avoid “system-down” frustrations. Furthermore, officials have issued stern warnings against counterfeiters attempting to sell substandard mixtures in look-alike government packaging, reinforcing that legitimate subsidized stock is only available at registered NCPB or county-authorized sites.

References:

Citizen Digital Gov’t to issue over 1 million bags of subsidized fertilizer amid high demand

Kenyans.co.ke Govt to Distribute 1 Million Bags of Fertilizer to NCPB Depots Next Week After Shortage

Daily Nation Kagwe orders destruction of 25,518 bags of expired fertiliser

Jijuze How to Access Subsidized Fertilizer in Kenya

The Digital Gatekeeper—Decoding Kenya’s New Era of Fertilizer Distribution

Posted on by

The transition from traditional, manual fertilizer distribution to the Kenya Integrated Agriculture Management Information System (KIAMIS) represents one of the most significant shifts in the nation’s agricultural history. As of late 2025, the Ministry of Agriculture has officially taken full ownership of this digital registry, which now hosts data for over 7.1 million smallholder farmers. This digital “handshake” is no longer a mere pilot program but the mandatory gateway for anyone seeking to purchase subsidized DAP, NPK, or CAN fertilizer at the government-capped price of Ksh 2,500. For the Kenyan farmer, this means the end of “analog” vouchers and the birth of a data-driven system where eligibility is determined not by a physical queue, but by a biometric profile and a verified USSD record. However, as Jijuze has discovered, the sheer scale of this migration has created a new set of digital hurdles that many are struggling to navigate.

The digital gateway for fertilizer subsidy

At the heart of this system lies the *616*3# USSD code, a simple string of digits that serves as the farmer’s primary interface with the KIAMIS cloud. When a farmer dials this code, they are not just checking a balance; they are interacting with a complex backend that validates their land acreage, crop type, and regional location. The 2025 updates to the platform have introduced even more granular requirements, including the integration of climate-shock insurance directly into the registration process. This means that for a farmer to receive an e-voucher via SMS, their data must be fully validated by both the local Assistant Chief and the Sub-County Agricultural Officer. We have received reports that thousands of farmers who believed they were “registered” are being turned away at National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB) depots because their profiles lack these critical secondary validations, highlighting a gap between initial data entry and final system approval.

Government targeting 500,000 farmers in KIAMIS registration drive | KBC Business

For the modern Kenyan smallholder, understanding the “Digital Gatekeeper” is now as essential as understanding the soil itself. The government’s 2025 policy emphasizes that the e-voucher system is designed to eliminate the “middleman” and “ghost farmers” who previously diverted subsidized stocks to the black market. By tying every bag of fertilizer to a specific ID number and a geo-tagged farm, the KIAMIS platform ensures that resources reach the intended hands. Yet, this digital-first approach demands a higher level of technical literacy. Farmers must ensure their mobile numbers are correctly linked to their ID and that they have not exceeded the allocated bags per acre—a limit strictly enforced by the algorithm. As the planting season approaches, the message from the Ministry is clear: the era of walking into a depot with just cash is over; if you are not in the cloud, you are not on the farm.

References:

Jijuze How to Access Subsidized Fertilizer in Kenya

Sacco Review Gov’t rolls out pioneering insurance-integrated fertilizer subsidy to safeguard smallholder farmers

The Kenya Times How Kenyans Can Apply for Govt Fertilizer Subsidy Program

Eagmark Agri-Hub Kenya Takes Ownership of National Digital Farmer Registry

The Adult Filter Is Overrated: Reclaiming the Small Wonders of Life

Posted on by

What does it mean to be a kid at heart?


In the frantic, non-stop race of modern life, we often chase the “big things”—the promotion, the huge vacation, the major milestone. Yet, some of the wisest people I know aren’t those with the biggest bank accounts or titles; they’re the ones who’ve mastered the art of being a kid at heart.
This doesn’t mean avoiding responsibility or acting immature. It means possessing a superpower we tend to lose with age: the ability to find pure, uncomplicated joy in the smallest moments.
Think about a child. Hand them a piece of candy, or watch the sheer concentration and triumph on their face when they successfully blow a huge bubble. Their reaction isn’t measured or conditional; it’s a burst of unfiltered gratitude and delight. A simple act of kindness, a silly joke, or even just mastering a small skill is met with a sincere, radiant smile. They express the purest impression of thankfulness, even for the minutest act they can comprehend.
That is the essence of being a kid at heart: The capacity to appreciate the little things that warm the soul and make the world brighter.
It’s about ditching the adult filter of cynicism and comparison, and allowing yourself to be truly present for the moment. It’s about feeling the sunshine on your face, laughing until your stomach hurts over something ridiculous, or getting genuinely excited about your favorite snack.
It’s an open invitation to a happier life. So, today, let’s all try to be a little less “grown-up” and a lot more like the kids who know that the best things in life aren’t things at all—they are tiny moments of wonder, waiting to be appreciated.

Aftershock: The Collateral Damage of USAID’s Exit from Kenya

Posted on by

The abrupt dissolution of USAID, catalyzed by the U.S. government’s sweeping “America First” foreign aid policy pivot, has left Kenya reeling from a vacuum of support once critical to its public health, agriculture, and economic systems. With over $2.5 billion in planned investments between 2020 and 2025, the agency was more than just a donor—it was woven into the fabric of Kenyan service delivery. The termination of 83% of USAID’s programs and the layoff of 94% of its staff effectively ended over six decades of robust U.S. development engagement. For Kenya, this rupture came without a viable transitional plan. Clinics shuttered, medicines vanished, and 40,000 jobs tied to health services evaporated. Programs such as PEPFAR, which had sustained over a million Kenyans on antiretroviral treatment, have been gutted, with HIV/AIDS funding slashed from $846M in 2023 to just $66M in 2025. Maternal health, malaria prevention, and reproductive health services now teeter at the edge of collapse, with service cuts exceeding 90% in some areas. Kenya’s health infrastructure, already strained, is now buckling under a loss that is not merely financial—but fatal.

The economic blowback extends far beyond healthcare. USAID had supported Kenya’s agriculture sector through subsidies, training, and innovation, all now dismantled. Smallholder farmers are especially vulnerable. With the termination of the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) after four decades of operation, Kenya has lost its primary mechanism for forecasting and responding to food insecurity. Meanwhile, tax reforms in the proposed 2025 Finance Bill—removing VAT exemptions on farm inputs and raising fuel duties—compound the crisis, inflating production costs and shrinking rural margins. The convergence of aid withdrawal, policy shocks, and climate threats is deepening food insecurity and threatening to reverse years of agricultural gains. Simultaneously, the Kenyan startup ecosystem and governance reform sectors face a projected $100 million funding shortfall. Civil society actors, often powered by USAID support, now risk losing their watchdog capacity. In areas such as conflict prevention and refugee education, where USAID once acted as a stabilizing force, the vacuum could be exploited by extremist recruiters, echoing conflict patterns seen in past aid shock cases in West Africa.

Kenya’s response has been urgent but encumbered. The government has committed to repatriating its health data from U.S.-hosted systems and shifting toward local infrastructure, yet faces severe capacity shortfalls. The fiscal strain is formidable: a KSh 52 billion health budget hole and a broader KSh 66.9 billion gap across affected sectors. While the Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda (BETA) reflects ambition for self-reliance through tax reforms and private investment, execution remains constrained by weak systems and widespread corruption. Still, civil society and policymakers are beginning to reframe the crisis as a wake-up call for domestic revenue mobilization and governance renewal. If there is a path forward, it lies in converting dependency into resilience—not just by replacing funding streams, but by rethinking national priorities, protecting human capital, and investing in sovereign, accountable systems that can withstand future geopolitical shocks.

References:

Citizen Digital Over 40,000 Kenyans jobless after USAID-funded health facilities shut down

The Voice of Africa USAID Shuts Down After 63 Years, Leaving Africa in Crisis

The Star Civil society calls for self-reliance as foreign aid dwindles

Africa.com Kenya to Reclaim Health Data After Trump Administration’s USAID Cuts

Jijuze Kenya Faces Crisis After USAID Funding Withdrawal

Capital Business USAID funding halt to hit Kenya’s economy, social sectors – report

Impact of Kenya’s Toxic Chemical Policy on Farmers and Exports

Posted on by

Kenya’s 2025 pesticide ban is more than a policy shift—it’s an overdue confrontation with dangerous agrochemical practices that have long gone unchecked. At the heart of the crackdown is Mancozeb, a fungicide so entrenched in Kenyan agriculture that it’s sprayed like water on tomatoes, potatoes, and maize. Yet this widely used chemical breaks down into ethylene thiourea (ETU)—a probable human carcinogen linked to thyroid harm and reproductive toxicity. Mancozeb has already been banned across the European Union and flagged by multiple global health authorities, but until now, it continued to flow into Kenyan markets with barely a check. Now, alongside Mancozeb, Kenya has also moved to restrict or suspend other hazardous products including chlorpyrifos, acephate, glyphosate, and dimethoate—compounds associated with cancer risks, neurotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and acute poisoning in both humans and animals. In withdrawing 77 toxic products and tightening rules on 202 more, the government is finally rejecting the toxic trade imbalance that treats African countries as chemical dumping grounds. The new policy aligns Kenyan regulation with international best practice: no pesticide can be registered here unless it’s also legal in its country of origin and in developed economies like the EU, USA, Canada, or Australia. It’s a turning point—but not without blowback.

A Report by K24TV

For years, Mancozeb symbolized Kenya’s regulatory inertia: cheap, accessible, and unchallenged despite the mounting science against it. Farmers, often unaware of its dangers, sprayed it without masks or gloves, storing the residues in their homes, their soil, and their food. Chlorpyrifos, a widely used insecticide linked to developmental harm in children, and glyphosate, a herbicide under global scrutiny for carcinogenicity, have followed similar trajectories—popular with farmers but flagged by scientists and health agencies. Now, the state faces a high-stakes transition. Smallholders reliant on these chemicals are being urged toward Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and agroecological alternatives. Yet less than 10% of Kenyan farmers use biopesticides, and most lack training, equipment, or trust in new inputs. The Pest Control Products Board, emboldened by fresh legislation, is finally flexing its oversight powers. But enforcement remains patchy, and counterfeit products exploit the regulatory vacuum. Mancozeb isn’t just a pesticide—it’s a case study in how economic expediency once overrode health and environmental responsibility. That era, Kenya now claims, is ending.

Timing is crucial. The EU is cracking down on residue limits. Kenya’s vegetable exports—once worth KSh 100 billion—have already taken a hit. If the country wants to stay competitive and credible, aligning with global safety standards is not optional. Mancozeb’s fall is both symbolic and strategic: it’s a warning to other harmful substances still in circulation—like profenofos, carbendazim, and triazophos—and a test of whether Kenya can enforce its own reform. This is where political will must hold—beyond press briefings and regulatory memos. Farmers need practical support. Consumers need transparency. And regulators must resist the pressure of well-funded pesticide lobbies looking to reverse course. Kenya has declared its direction. Now the country must walk it—with clarity, speed, and resolve—before the next generation pays the price in poisoned soil, sickened bodies, and lost trade.

References:

Trade World News Kenya Bans Import of 50 Pesticide Brands for Safer Farming

The Standard State cracks down on harmful pesticides, bans 77 products

The Star Civil society demand full disclosure of banned pesticides, calls for safer agricultural reforms

The Star 77 pesticides banned in Kenya as 202 others restricted – CS Kagwe

Kenya News Agency State urged to make to make public list of banned pesticides

Kenyans.co.ke Kenya Bans Use of Pesticides Not Approved in Europe, USA, Canada & Australia

Government’s Bold Move: Leasing Sugar Factories in Kenya

Posted on by

Kenya just handed over four of its biggest sugar factories — but kept the land. In a dramatic policy shift, the Ruto administration signed 30-year leases in May 2025 with private firms to run Nzoia, Chemelil, Muhoroni, and Sony Sugar. The goal? End decades of sugar sector chaos: collapsed factories, billions in unpaid debts, unpaid workers, and cheap imports undercutting farmers. Agriculture CS Mutahi Kagwe says this isn’t privatization — it’s “strategic leasing,” with public ownership preserved and billions in arrears cleared to give the new operators a clean start. Big names like Jaswant Rai’s West Kenya Sugar and Kibos Sugar are now in charge — and they’re expected to invest heavily. But not everyone’s cheering.

A Report by NTV Kenya

Local leaders are furious. Kisumu’s Governor Anyang’ Nyong’o is calling foul, slamming the deals as opaque, exclusionary, and a threat to community-owned land. At Chemelil and Nzoia, workers are protesting over unpaid wages, job security, and fears that private operators will trample their rights. Farmers worry about price manipulation and monopolies. And watchdogs are questioning the wisdom of the government wiping out billions in past debts — on taxpayers’ backs — without clear guarantees of public return. The Auditor General has already flagged risks to the Commodities Fund. If this feels familiar, it’s because Kenya’s SOE reform playbook hasn’t changed much in decades: bold plans, shaky execution, and the ever-present risk of insider deals dressed up as national progress.

Still — if the government gets this right — it could turn a rotting industry into a competitive, tech-upgraded, farmer-friendly economic engine. But it won’t happen without airtight oversight, crystal-clear contracts, local accountability, and a serious break from past mistakes. Leasing might be smarter than selling — but only if it comes with more transparency than politics usually allows.

References:

The Standard Nyong’o opposes the government’s plans to lease sugar mills

The Eastleigh Voice Government leases four state-owned sugar mills to private firms for 30 years

Business Daily Workers oppose Chemelil sugar factory lease plans

The Star Sugarcane farmers welcome move to lease sugar firms

All Africa Kenya: High Court Dismisses Petition Against Leasing of State-Owned Sugar Farms


Impact of U.S. Tariffs on Kenya’s Trade and Economy

Posted on by

In a move that has dramatically altered Kenya’s trade dynamics with the United States, the Trump administration imposed a blanket 10% tariff on imports from most nations, including Kenya, effective April 2025. This action effectively nullified the longstanding preferential treatment Kenya enjoyed under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), a Congressional framework set to expire in September 2025. The result has been a sharp contraction in Kenya’s export competitiveness, particularly in the apparel and agricultural sectors, which together accounted for a significant share of exports to the U.S. The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) estimates the country could lose as much as USD 100 million annually in export revenue—a loss that represents over 13% of Kenya’s total exports to the U.S. The textiles and apparel industry, which employs tens of thousands in Export Processing Zones (EPZs), faces the steepest consequences, with squeezed margins threatening factory closures and mass layoffs. Compounding this is the complex global trade environment, where some of Kenya’s competitors face even steeper tariffs—suggesting a theoretical competitive edge—but domestic cost disadvantages like high energy prices and infrastructure bottlenecks could prevent Kenya from capitalizing on this.

A Report by Citizen TV Kenya

The introduction of the tariffs also triggered immediate market reactions, particularly on the Kenyan Shilling (KES), which depreciated upon the announcement, reflecting investor anxiety and a broader loss of confidence. While the KES had been strengthening in early 2025 due to improved foreign exchange reserves, tight monetary policy, and robust diaspora remittances, the tariffs introduced new downward pressures through trade disruption and a worsening current account balance. Analysts project a continued depreciation trend through 2025, with some forecasts suggesting the KES could reach as low as 155 to the dollar. Factors contributing to this outlook include high external debt servicing obligations, the CBK’s decision to pursue accommodative monetary policy—cutting rates to stimulate domestic demand—and narrowing interest rate differentials with the U.S., which could dampen investor appetite for KES-denominated assets. Although inflation is largely under control and remittances remain strong, these buffers may not fully offset the structural pressures introduced by disrupted trade flows and persistent macroeconomic imbalances. Moreover, Kenya’s exposure to external shocks remains high, and market sentiment continues to react swiftly to any signals of instability or shifts in U.S. policy.

A Report by NBC News

In response to these mounting pressures, the Kenyan government has adopted a multi-pronged strategy centered on diplomatic engagement, trade diversification, and internal economic reforms. Efforts are underway to secure a waiver from the 10% tariff through negotiations with U.S. officials, although progress remains uncertain. Simultaneously, Kenya is accelerating its participation in the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), which offers a long-term avenue to diversify trade partnerships within Africa. However, AfCFTA implementation faces its own hurdles, including infrastructure gaps, non-tariff barriers, and complex rules of origin that limit short-term gains. Beyond the continent, Kenya is looking to strengthen trade ties with the European Union, with whom it signed an Economic Partnership Agreement in 2023, and explore new opportunities in Asia and the Middle East. On the domestic front, the government is considering measures to support affected sectors, including targeted incentives for exporters and investments in value addition. Nonetheless, these responses may take time to yield meaningful relief. With AGOA’s expiry nearing and no replacement framework yet secured, Kenya’s vulnerability to abrupt shifts in U.S. trade policy has been laid bare, reinforcing the urgent need to build a more resilient, diversified, and self-sufficient export economy.

References:

Capital Business Shilling falls amid uncertainty over US tariff hikes

Capital Business Kenya risks losing Sh14bn in exports to U.S. after 10pc tariff

The Star Kenya to diversity trade ties, push for more intra-Africa trade – CS Kinyanjui.

Serrari U.S. Hits Kenya with 10% Export Tariff Amid Shifting Global Trade Dynamics

The Standard Trump tariffs threaten Kenya’s Sh72b exports

All Africa Africa: How the New U.S. Tariffs Were Calculated and What They Mean for AGOA Trade Deal

Kenya’s Yellow Maize Strategy Offers Relief, But Raises Serious Public Health Concerns

Posted on by

Faced with a deepening maize crisis and the threat of unaffordable unga prices for millions of households, the Kenyan government has authorized the importation of yellow maize under a 50% duty waiver. The policy aims to ease the strain on white maize—Kenya’s staple grain for human consumption—by diverting demand from feed manufacturers. By encouraging millers in the animal feed industry to substitute white maize with yellow maize, the government hopes to reduce competition for white maize, making it more accessible and affordable to food processors and, ultimately, to consumers. However, this economic intervention carries unintended consequences that could undermine its goals. Due to Kenya’s fragmented supply chains and patchy enforcement mechanisms, experts warn that the clear division between maize meant for animals and that meant for humans may not hold. The significantly lower price of the imported yellow maize could tempt unscrupulous traders to redirect it into the human food market—either by blending it with white maize flour or selling it directly in low-income areas where yellow maize is already accepted as food, such as parts of Western Kenya. In places like Homa Bay County, where yellow maize is widely consumed in the form of ugali, this policy shift could unintentionally flood the food supply with grain that may not meet safety standards for human consumption.

A Report by NTV Kenya

The core of the concern lies in the persistent and well-documented threat of aflatoxin contamination, a toxic compound produced by mold that thrives in warm, humid conditions—particularly in improperly stored grains. While Kenya has established aflatoxin limits aligned with East African Community standards—10 parts per billion (ppb) for total aflatoxins and 5 ppb for aflatoxin B1—systemic challenges hinder enforcement. Many small-scale producers, informal traders, and millers lack access to the sophisticated equipment and financial resources needed to test for aflatoxins or implement preventive storage solutions. Furthermore, there have been troubling precedents that cast doubt on the robustness of regulatory oversight. In 2011, a shipment of aflatoxin-contaminated maize from the U.S. was allegedly released into the market despite being flagged by authorities, with reports suggesting that the Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS) was blocked from conducting proper inspections. More recently, in January 2025, a 2,000-tonne shipment of rice from Pakistan was found to exceed aflatoxin limits, indicating that lapses in import control remain a pressing issue. These incidents demonstrate that having regulations on paper is not enough—especially when imports labeled for animal feed, which undergo less rigorous scrutiny, may be co-opted into the human food chain in the absence of strict monitoring, reliable segregation mechanisms, and transparent accountability.

The potential health implications of increased aflatoxin exposure are grave and far-reaching, especially for vulnerable populations who rely heavily on maize as their primary food source. Acute exposure can lead to severe liver damage, jaundice, and even death, while long-term, low-level exposure is linked to liver cancer, immune system suppression, nutrient malabsorption, and developmental issues in children. Infants and young children face elevated risks due to their small body mass and the fact that complementary weaning foods are often maize-based, yet specific aflatoxin regulations for these products are either absent or poorly enforced. For populations with pre-existing liver conditions, Hepatitis B infections, or compromised immunity—such as people living with HIV—the health risks are significantly amplified. Malnourished individuals and rural subsistence farmers, who often rely on their own poorly stored harvests, are also at heightened risk. In the face of this looming danger, health advocates and food safety experts are calling on the Kenyan government to urgently invest in comprehensive and well-coordinated countermeasures. These include rigorous aflatoxin testing of all maize imports, stricter enforcement to prevent feed-grade yellow maize from entering the human food stream, large-scale public education campaigns targeting high-risk regions, and long-term investments in improved post-harvest storage infrastructure. Without such measures, the policy designed to stabilize food prices could inadvertently trigger a public health emergency—one that disproportionately affects the country’s poorest and most vulnerable.

References:

Nation Kagwe bows to pressure, opens imports as unga prices hit 13-month high

Jijuze Maize Prices Surge: Impact on Kenya’s Livestock and Food Security

Milling Middle East & Africa Kenya to halt maize, sugar imports in 2025 after achieving self-sufficiency

The Star Why state will allow importation 5.5 million bags of yellow maize – Kagwe

Randox Food Diagnostics Kenyans at risk of aflatoxin contamination as KEBS flags 2,000-tonne rice shipment

Business Daily Turn Kenya farms yellow with maize for food security







Maize Prices Surge: Impact on Kenya’s Livestock and Food Security

Posted on by

The specter of a significant food crisis is looming over Kenya as a severe maize shortage grips the nation, sending prices soaring and sparking urgent warnings from key industry players. The Poultry Breeders Association of Kenya and the Association of Kenya Feed Manufacturers have jointly raised the alarm, highlighting a dramatic 45% surge in maize prices since the start of the year, with costs projected to climb even further by April. This sharp increase is directly translating to a painful escalation in the cost of living for millions of Kenyans, as maize flour, the staple ingredient for the widely consumed ‘ugali,’ becomes increasingly expensive. For households already struggling with tight budgets, this spike in the price of a fundamental food item poses a significant threat to their food security and overall well-being. The crisis underscores the delicate balance within the nation’s food system and the profound impact that fluctuations in the availability and cost of a single commodity like maize can have on the lives of ordinary citizens.

A Report on How to Plant Maize in Kenya by Citizen Digital

The ramifications of this maize shortage extend far beyond the immediate concerns of household consumption, creating a domino effect throughout the interconnected agricultural sector. The livestock industry, particularly poultry farming, is facing a critical challenge as maize constitutes a primary component of animal feed. The exorbitant rise in maize prices has led to a corresponding surge in the cost of producing animal feed, a burden that is inevitably passed on to farmers. Consequently, consumers are now facing higher prices for essential animal products such as chicken, eggs, meat, and dairy, further compounding the financial strain on families. This intricate link between maize production and the livestock sector demonstrates the vulnerability of the entire food supply chain to disruptions affecting a single key input. The crisis highlights how a shortage in one area of agriculture can trigger price hikes and economic hardship across multiple sectors, ultimately impacting the affordability and accessibility of a wide range of food products for the Kenyan population.

In response to this escalating crisis, industry associations are urgently appealing to the government for immediate intervention, primarily advocating for the waiver of import duties on maize to facilitate increased imports and stabilize the runaway prices. While the government has historically employed measures such as fertilizer subsidies to support local production, the current situation demands swift action to address the immediate supply deficit. The long-term solution, however, lies in building a more resilient and diversified food system. This includes promoting the production and consumption of alternative, nutritious crops to reduce the nation’s heavy reliance on maize, investing in improved storage facilities to minimize post-harvest losses, and adopting sustainable agricultural practices to enhance productivity and withstand future climate shocks. The current maize crisis serves as a stark reminder of the need for a comprehensive and coordinated approach to ensure food security for all Kenyans, safeguarding livelihoods and stabilizing the economy against the volatile nature of agricultural markets and environmental factors.

References:

The Star Industry players warn of imminent food crisis on maize shortage, rising prices

Milling Middle East & Africa Kenya’s maize harvest to surge 15% in 2025/2026:  USDA

Capital Business Maize shortage sparks food crisis as prices soar

KIPPRA Four Ways to Address the Rising Food Prices in Kenya

Busara Groundwork Cultivating resilience: Promoting investment in alternative agricultural products for enhanced food security in Kenya PDF