The impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is the culmination of a series of political missteps and growing public disillusionment. Despite his attempts to halt the process through legal means, the momentum behind his ouster seems unstoppable. Key legal provisions under Article 150 of Kenya’s Constitution provide a clear framework for removing the Deputy President on grounds of gross misconduct, a violation of the Constitution, or inability to perform official duties. Critics argue that Gachagua’s leadership has fallen short of these standards, with accusations of incompetence and mismanagement forming the basis of the impeachment. As Parliament debates his future, Gachagua finds himself in a precarious position, relying on his dwindling political allies to defend him against a rising tide of opposition.

In the broader context of East African politics, deputy leaders often become scapegoats for larger systemic issues within the government. Historically, East African countries have witnessed several instances where deputies were removed to pacify internal dissent or to realign political interests. Kenya, in particular, has a history of strained relationships between presidents and their deputies, with the infamous fallout between President Moi and Vice President Mwai Kibaki in March 1988, serving as a key example. Gachagua’s case mirrors these historical struggles, as his weakening influence within the coalition and failure to effectively navigate political alliances have made him vulnerable to impeachment. His perceived failure to secure Mt. Kenya’s political interests, combined with deteriorating relations with President Ruto, has created an opening for his political adversaries.

The national reactions to Gachagua’s potential ouster have been deeply polarized, with regional leaders and citizens offering mixed responses. In his Mt. Kenya stronghold, many accuse him of abandoning the region’s interests, aligning too closely with President Ruto’s Rift Valley faction. This sense of betrayal has been a significant factor in the push for his impeachment. However, Gachagua still retains some support in the Rift Valley, though even here, the mood is shifting. Public participation forums held across the country last weekend showed that many citizens favor his removal, signaling a desire for a change in leadership. This groundswell of public opinion, coupled with mounting political pressure, points to a likely impeachment. For Gachagua, the parliamentary debate represents not just a fight for political survival but a reckoning with the broader frustrations felt by many Kenyans over Kenya Kwanza’s governance.

References:

Reuters Kenya’s deputy president asks court to halt his impeachment

RFI Kenya’s deputy president faces impeachment as ruling coalition fractures

Nation Martha Karua: Ruto, Gachagua should be impeached

ABC News Kenya’s deputy president defends himself before impeachment